229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35409728)
1. Public Compliance Matters in Evidence-Based Public Health Policy: Evidence from Evaluating Social Distancing in the First Wave of COVID-19.
Wang C; Li H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Untying the Precise Impact of COVID-19 Policy on Social Distancing Behavior.
Shahzad F; Du J; Khan I; Ahmad Z; Shahbaz M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33494178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.
Apio C; Han K; Lee D; Lee B; Park T
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Jan; 10():e47099. PubMed ID: 38190233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No Place Like Home: Cross-National Data Analysis of the Efficacy of Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Delen D; Eryarsoy E; Davazdahemami B
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 May; 6(2):e19862. PubMed ID: 32434145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pandemic responsiveness: Evidence from social distancing and lockdown policy during COVID-19.
Besley T; Dray S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267611. PubMed ID: 35587464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social distancing policies in 22 African countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a desk review.
Verani A; Clodfelter C; Menon AN; Chevinsky J; Victory K; Hakim A
Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 37(Suppl 1):46. PubMed ID: 33552374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of mass gatherings on the local transmission of COVID-19 and the implications for social distancing policies: Evidence from Hong Kong.
Zhu P; Tan X; Wang M; Guo F; Shi S; Li Z
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0279539. PubMed ID: 36724151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring sensitivity to social distancing behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kontokosta CE; Hong B; Bonczak BJ
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16350. PubMed ID: 36175577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public Compliance With Social Distancing Measures and SARS-CoV-2 Spread : A Quantitative Analysis of 5 States.
Liu H; Chen C; Cruz-Cano R; Guida JL; Lee M
Public Health Rep; 2021; 136(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 33909541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on awareness of COVID-19 and compliance with social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia.
Mukhlis H; Widyastuti T; Harlianty RA; Susanti S; Kumalasari D
J Community Psychol; 2022 Apr; 50(3):1564-1578. PubMed ID: 34716601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Designing social distancing policies for the COVID-19 pandemic: A probabilistic model predictive control approach.
Armaou A; Katch B; Russo L; Siettos C
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Jun; 19(9):8804-8832. PubMed ID: 35942737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19.
Adolph C; Amano K; Bang-Jensen B; Fullman N; Wilkerson J
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2021 Apr; 46(2):211-233. PubMed ID: 32955556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of COVID-19 Management Policies Tailored to Airborne SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Policy Analysis.
Telles CR; Roy A; Ajmal MR; Mustafa SK; Ahmad MA; de la Serna JM; Frigo EP; Rosales MH
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Apr; 7(4):e20699. PubMed ID: 33729168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preparing for a future COVID-19 wave: insights and limitations from a data-driven evaluation of non-pharmaceutical interventions in Germany.
Aravindakshan A; Boehnke J; Gholami E; Nayak A
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20084. PubMed ID: 33208764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How effective are social distancing policies? Evidence on the fight against COVID-19.
Glogowsky U; Hansen E; Schächtele S
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257363. PubMed ID: 34550995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strong Social Distancing Measures In The United States Reduced The COVID-19 Growth Rate.
Courtemanche C; Garuccio J; Le A; Pinkston J; Yelowitz A
Health Aff (Millwood); 2020 Jul; 39(7):1237-1246. PubMed ID: 32407171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chance elections, social distancing restrictions, and KENTUCKY's early COVID-19 experience.
Courtemanche C; Garuccio J; Le A; Pinkston J; Yelowitz A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0250152. PubMed ID: 34197461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The paradox of pandemic mitigation? Moderating role of pandemic severity on the impact of social distancing policies: a cultural value perspective.
Ma X; Chen B; Zhao Y
Global Health; 2024 Feb; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 38331903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Differential Consequences of Fear, Anger, and Depression in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea.
Choi J; Kim KH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 35682335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey.
Fridman I; Lucas N; Henke D; Zigler CK
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Sep; 6(3):e22060. PubMed ID: 32930670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
