266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35410544)
1. Comprehensive Evaluation of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) Spinal Hardware for Proton and Photon Planning.
Shi C; Lin H; Huang S; Xiong W; Hu L; Choi I; Press R; Hasan S; Simone C; Chhabra A
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221091700. PubMed ID: 35410544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy-a phantom study.
Poel R; Belosi F; Albertini F; Walser M; Gisep A; Lomax AJ; Weber DC
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245031. PubMed ID: 32315991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dosimetric impact of stabilizing spinal implants in radiotherapy treatment planning with protons and photons: standard titanium alloy vs. radiolucent carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK systems.
Müller BS; Ryang YM; Oechsner M; Düsberg M; Meyer B; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 21(8):6-14. PubMed ID: 32476247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning.
Warren S; Partridge M; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Hurt C; Crosby T; Hawkins MA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 27084641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological optimization for hybrid proton-photon radiotherapy.
Li W; Lin Y; Li HH; Shen X; Chen RC; Gao H
Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(11):. PubMed ID: 38759678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers.
Huber FA; Sprengel K; Müller L; Graf LC; Osterhoff G; Guggenberger R
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33588781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraction optimization for hybrid proton-photon treatment planning.
Li W; Zhang W; Lin Y; Chen RC; Gao H
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3311-3323. PubMed ID: 36786202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Hung HM; Chan OCM; Mak CH; Hung WM; Ng WT; Lee MCH
Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 34470708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning of thoracic vertebral metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Mallory M; Pokhrel D; Badkul R; Jiang H; Lominska C; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):54-61. PubMed ID: 29349867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.
Weber DC; Bogner J; Verwey J; Georg D; Dieckmann K; Escudé L; Caro M; Pötter R; Goitein G; Lomax AJ; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 16168832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advancing knowledge-based intensity modulated proton planning for adaptive treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.
Johnson CL; Hasan S; Huang S; Lin H; Gorovets D; Shim A; Apgar T; Yu F; Tsai P
Med Dosim; 2024 Spring; 49(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 37914563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility study of hybrid inverse planning with transmission beams and single-energy spread-out Bragg peaks for proton FLASH radiotherapy.
Ma C; Yang X; Chang CW; Liu R; Bohannon D; Lin L; Liu T; Tian S; Zhou J
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3687-3700. PubMed ID: 36932635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
