137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35410732)
21. Interest of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET scanning.
Khebbeb S; Rathat G; Serrand C; Bourdon A; Ferrer C; Duraes M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():234-239. PubMed ID: 35397374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. False negative rate at
Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Extra-axillary nodal metastases in breast cancer: comparison of ultrasound, MRI, PET/CT, and CT.
Chung HL; Shin K; Sun J; Leung JWT
Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():113-118. PubMed ID: 33933824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Brockbank E; Kokka F; Bryant A; Pomel C; Reynolds K
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Apr; (4):CD008217. PubMed ID: 21491407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intermediate dose-volume parameters and the development of late rectal toxicity after MRI-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
Ujaimi R; Milosevic M; Fyles A; Beiki-Ardakani A; Carlone M; Jiang H; Lindsay P; Xie J; Gerber R; Croke J; Skliarenko J; Levin W; Han K
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(5):968-975.e2. PubMed ID: 28757404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [
Adam JA; van Diepen PR; Mom CH; Stoker J; van Eck-Smit BLF; Bipat S
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):588-596. PubMed ID: 32921477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling.
Meads C; Auguste P; Davenport C; Małysiak S; Sundar S; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Guest P; Thangaratinam S; Martin-Hirsch P; Borowiack E; Barton P; Roberts T; Khan K
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(12):1-323. PubMed ID: 23537558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Place of cystoscopy in the staging of cervical cancer].
Boivin D; Grégoire M
Prog Urol; 2003 Dec; 13(6):1351-3. PubMed ID: 15000312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.
Kim HJ; Cho A; Yun M; Kim YT; Kang WJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 26546334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cystoscopy after computed tomography scan to identify bladder invasion in cervical cancer.
Sundborg MJ; Taylor RR; Mark J; Elg SA
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 9721771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion.
Ippolito D; Drago SG; Franzesi CT; Fior D; Sironi S
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 22(20):4891-900. PubMed ID: 27239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brush J; Boyd K; Chappell F; Crawford F; Dozier M; Fenwick E; Glanville J; McIntosh H; Renehan A; Weller D; Dunlop M
Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(35):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21958472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic performance of conventional and advanced imaging modalities for assessing newly diagnosed cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Woo S; Atun R; Ward ZJ; Scott AM; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5560-5577. PubMed ID: 32415584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revised FIGO Staging for Cervical Cancer - A New Role for MRI.
Merz J; Bossart M; Bamberg F; Eisenblaetter M
Rofo; 2020 Oct; 192(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 32731266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The combination of preoperative PET/CT and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer.
Papadia A; Gasparri ML; Genoud S; Bernd K; Mueller MD
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2275-2281. PubMed ID: 28669052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.
Sahdev A; Sohaib SA; Wenaden AE; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 17309561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utility of CT Scan in Detecting Bladder Involvement Among Patients With Cervical Carcinoma.
Agrawal R; Agarwal R
Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e53670. PubMed ID: 38455819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings.
Yildirim Y; Sehirali S; Avci ME; Yilmaz C; Ertopcu K; Tinar S; Duman Y; Sayhan S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jan; 108(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 17945337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic lymph-node metastases in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer: comparison with MRI findings.
Lv K; Guo HM; Lu YJ; Wu ZX; Zhang K; Han JK
Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1204-11. PubMed ID: 25222911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
