137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35410732)
41. Hematuria screening test for urinary bladder mucosal infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chuttiangtum A; Udomthavornsuk B; Chumworathayi B
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(10):4931-3. PubMed ID: 23244084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The diagnostic value of PET/CT scanning in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective study.
Loft A; Berthelsen AK; Roed H; Ottosen C; Lundvall L; Knudsen J; Nedergaard L; Højgaard L; Engelholm SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 17482666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases.
Stecco A; Buemi F; Cassarà A; Matheoud R; Sacchetti GM; Arnulfo A; Brambilla M; Carriero A
Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):537-45. PubMed ID: 27033474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparative benefits and limitations of 18F-FDG PET and CT-MRI in documented or suspected recurrent cervical cancer.
Yen TC; Lai CH; Ma SY; Huang KG; Huang HJ; Hong JH; Hsueh S; Lin WJ; Ng KK; Chang TC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Dec; 33(12):1399-407. PubMed ID: 16847653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Zolciak-Siwinska A; Kowalczyk A; Sikorska K; Bijok M; Michalski W; Gruszczynska E
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(4):667-672. PubMed ID: 29764769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
Suzuki M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography has a clinical impact for patients with cervical cancer.
Sandvik RM; Jensen PT; Hendel HW; Palle C
Dan Med Bull; 2011 Mar; 58(3):A4240. PubMed ID: 21371401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Accuracy of high-resolution MRI with lumen distention in rectal cancer staging and circumferential margin involvement prediction.
Iannicelli E; Di Renzo S; Ferri M; Pilozzi E; Di Girolamo M; Sapori A; Ziparo V; David V
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24497790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging.
Subak LL; Hricak H; Powell CB; Azizi L; Stern JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 7784021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Pre-treatment prediction of early response to chemoradiotherapy by quantitative analysis of baseline staging FDG-PET/CT and MRI in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Min LA; Ackermans LL; Nowee ME; Griethuysen JJV; Roberti S; Maas M; Vogel WV; Beets-Tan RG; Lambregts DM
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):940-948. PubMed ID: 32722967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of diagnostic performance between CT and MRI for detection of cartilage invasion for primary tumor staging in patients with laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cho SJ; Lee JH; Suh CH; Kim JY; Kim D; Lee JB; Lee MK; Chung SR; Choi YJ; Baek JH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3803-3812. PubMed ID: 32152744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The application of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative evaluation of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Petric A; Stojanov D; Lilic V; Filipovic S; Bosnjakovic P; Zivadinovic R; Lilic G; Todorovska I; Vrbic S; Pejcic I
J BUON; 2011; 16(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 22006756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Invasion of the urinary bladder by uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation with MR imaging.
Kim SH; Han MC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):393-7. PubMed ID: 9016214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Seminal vesicle invasion on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with histopathology.
Grivas N; Hinnen K; de Jong J; Heemsbergen W; Moonen L; Witteveen T; van der Poel H; Heijmink S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():107-112. PubMed ID: 29279147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma: a meta-analysis.
Muchow RD; Resnick DK; Abdel MP; Munoz A; Anderson PA
J Trauma; 2008 Jan; 64(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 18188119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The PRICE study: The role of conventional and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered by chemoradiation followed by radical surgery.
Valentini AL; Miccò M; Gui B; Giuliani M; Rodolfino E; Telesca AM; Pasciuto T; Testa A; Gambacorta MA; Zannoni G; Rufini V; Giordano A; Valentini V; Scambia G; Manfredi R
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2425-2435. PubMed ID: 29318432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
