These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35411754)

  • 21. Assessment of the implementation of HIV-rapid test kits at different levels of health institutions in Ethiopia.
    Tegbaru B; Wolday D; Messele T; Meless H; Kassa D; Tesema D; Tamene W; Ahmedin Z; Adane A; Tebeje M; Gezahegn N; Birhanu H; Mengistu Y; Wuhib T; Fekadu M
    Ethiop Med J; 2007 Jul; 45(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 18330330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of 10 kits for determination of human choriogonadotropin in serum.
    Rasor JL; Farber S; Braunstein GD
    Clin Chem; 1983 Oct; 29(10):1828-31. PubMed ID: 6616833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Designing traceable opioid material
    Mojica MA; Carter MD; Isenberg SL; Pirkle JL; Hamelin EI; Shaner RL; Seymour C; Sheppard CI; Baldwin GT; Johnson RC
    Toxicol Lett; 2019 Dec; 317():53-58. PubMed ID: 31560942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Roche/BIOTECON Diagnostics LightCycler foodproof L. monocytogenes detection kit in combination with ShortPrep foodproof II Kit. Performance-Tested Method 070401.
    Junge B; Berghof-Jäger K
    J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(2):374-98. PubMed ID: 16640287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation, certification and registration of veterinary diagnostic test kits by the World Organisation for Animal Health Secretariat for Registration of Diagnostic Kits.
    Gifford G; Szabo M; Hibbard R; Mateo D; Colling A; Gardner I; Erlacher Vindel E
    Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):173-188. PubMed ID: 34140732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Discussion on the revision of National Administrative Provisions for the Sampling and Testing of Quality Supervision on Medical Devices].
    Hao Q; Shi X; Zhang X; Zhu J
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 37(5):373-5, 378. PubMed ID: 24409801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Panel of reference strains for evaluating serologic reagents used to identify gonococci.
    Evins GM; Pigott NE; Knapp JS; DeWitt WE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 3125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The new European directive on in vitro diagnostics.
    Dati F
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Oct; 41(10):1289-98. PubMed ID: 14580154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparison of homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood samples].
    Liu FP; Liu JC; Wang DW
    Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 20(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 16816873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of kits for the determination of creatine kinase activity in serum.
    Canalias F; Saco Y; Gella FJ
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Aug; 33(8):535-9. PubMed ID: 8547439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The accuracy and standardization of TBG kits.
    Howorth PJ; Raouf AA; Keightley HG; Marsden P; O'Gorman P
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 1980 Nov; 13(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 6784977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Review of test kit methods in comparison to Health Canada reference method for Listeria.
    J AOAC Int; 2013; 96(2):217. PubMed ID: 23767341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of package inserts for diagnostic kits.
    Secchiero S; Sciacovelli L; Bonvicini P; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 1999 Jun; 37(6):663-5. PubMed ID: 10475075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technical aspects in laboratory testing for antiphospholipid antibodies: is standardization an impossible dream?
    Reber G; Boehlen F; de Moerloose P
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2008 Jun; 34(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 18814067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Home sampling kits for sexually transmitted infections: preferences and concerns of men who have sex with men.
    Wayal S; Llewellyn C; Smith H; Fisher M
    Cult Health Sex; 2011 Mar; 13(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 21154069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Discussion on Technical Evaluation Requirements of Allergen Detection Reagent Pre-marketing].
    Yang XH; Dong QF; Zhang L; Wang YH; Zhu WW
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2022 May; 46(3):318-322. PubMed ID: 35678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparative study of five commercial reagents for the Coulter Model S: a proposed method for reagent evaluation.
    Nosanchuk JS; D'Souza JP; Mudholkar GS; Lin CC; Verno M; Buchanan B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1978 May; 102(5):258-62. PubMed ID: 25639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [WHO in Vitro Diagnostic Reagent Products Prequalification Program].
    Lv H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2016; 40(4):275-8. PubMed ID: 29775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The new IVD Regulation 2017/746: a case study at a large university hospital laboratory in Belgium demonstrates the need for clarification on the degrees of freedom laboratories have to use lab-developed tests to improve patient care.
    Vermeersch P; Van Aelst T; Dequeker EMC
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 59(1):101-106. PubMed ID: 32692695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of seven prothrombin time reagents--development of an evaluation strategy.
    Carter CJ; Griswold DJ; Louis RA; Hershler R; Wadsworth LD
    Mod Pathol; 1988 Jul; 1(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 3237706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.