195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35412367)
1. Deep Learning Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy at US Compared with O-RADS and Expert Assessment.
Chen H; Yang BW; Qian L; Meng YS; Bai XH; Hong XW; He X; Jiang MJ; Yuan F; Du QW; Feng WW
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):106-113. PubMed ID: 35412367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External Validation of O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System.
Hack K; Gandhi N; Bouchard-Fortier G; Chawla TP; Ferguson SE; Li S; Kahn D; Tyrrell PN; Glanc P
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 35438559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced US to Improve Diagnostic Performance of O-RADS US Risk Stratification System for Malignancy.
Yuan K; Huang YJ; Mao MY; Li T; Wang SJ; He DN; Liu WF; Li MX; Zhu XM; Chen XY; Zhu YX
Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e223003. PubMed ID: 37552073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and validation of an ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant risk of ovarian tumours.
Du Y; Xiao Y; Guo W; Yao J; Lan T; Li S; Wen H; Zhu W; He G; Zheng H; Chen H
Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Apr; 23(1):41. PubMed ID: 38594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors using Resnet34 on ultrasound images.
Miao K; Zhao N; Lv Q; He X; Xu M; Dong X; Li D; Shao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2910-2917. PubMed ID: 37696522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.
Cao L; Wei M; Liu Y; Fu J; Zhang H; Huang J; Pei X; Zhou J
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33966893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study.
Du Y; Guo W; Xiao Y; Chen H; Yao J; Wu J
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Apr; 24(1):89. PubMed ID: 38622546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound image analysis using deep neural networks for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with expert subjective assessment.
Christiansen F; Epstein EL; Smedberg E; Åkerlund M; Smith K; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 57(1):155-163. PubMed ID: 33142359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment.
Wengert GJ; Dabi Y; Kermarrec E; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Poncelet E; Porcher R; Thomassin-Naggara I; Rockall AG;
Radiology; 2022 Jun; 303(3):566-575. PubMed ID: 35230183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.
Li Y; Shao G; Wu M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Shao C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Feb; 50(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 37990446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.
Gong LP; Li XY; Wu YN; Dong S; Zhang S; Feng YN; Lv YE; Guo XJ; Peng YQ; Du XS; Tian JW; Sun CX; Sun LT
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 36945000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. US Risk Stratification System for Follicular Thyroid Neoplasms.
Li J; Li C; Zhou X; Huang J; Yang P; Cang Y; Zhai H; Huang R; Mu Y; Gou X; Zhang Y; Yu J; Liang P
Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230949. PubMed ID: 37987664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
