These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35413556)

  • 1. Real meat and plant-based meat analogues have different in vitro protein digestibility properties.
    Xie Y; Cai L; Zhao D; Liu H; Xu X; Zhou G; Li C
    Food Chem; 2022 Sep; 387():132917. PubMed ID: 35413556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plant-Based Meat Analogues Weaken Gastrointestinal Digestive Function and Show Less Digestibility Than Real Meat in Mice.
    Xie Y; Cai L; Huang Z; Shan K; Xu X; Zhou G; Li C
    J Agric Food Chem; 2022 Oct; 70(39):12442-12455. PubMed ID: 36070521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative peptidomic profile and bioactivities of cooked beef, pork, chicken and turkey meat after in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion.
    Martini S; Conte A; Tagliazucchi D
    J Proteomics; 2019 Sep; 208():103500. PubMed ID: 31454557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peptidomics comparison of plant-based meat alternatives and processed meat after in vitro digestion.
    Xing Z; Li J; Zhang Y; Gao A; Xie H; Gao Z; Chu X; Cai Y; Gu C
    Food Res Int; 2022 Aug; 158():111462. PubMed ID: 35840194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The red, firm, non-exudative and pale, soft, exudative pork have different in vitro digestive properties of protein.
    Li S; Diao X; Mao X; Liu H; Shan K; Zhao D; Zhou G; Li C
    Meat Sci; 2023 Apr; 198():109110. PubMed ID: 36640717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrimination of in vitro and in vivo digestion products of meat proteins from pork, beef, chicken, and fish.
    Wen S; Zhou G; Song S; Xu X; Voglmeir J; Liu L; Zhao F; Li M; Li L; Yu X; Bai Y; Li C
    Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 15(21):3688-98. PubMed ID: 26227428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pork and pork by-products on macronutrient and energy digestibility and palatability in large exotic felids.
    Iske CJ; Morris CL; Kappen KL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3738-3745. PubMed ID: 27898922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digestibility and gastrointestinal fate of meat versus plant-based meat analogs: An in vitro comparison.
    Zhou H; Hu Y; Tan Y; Zhang Z; McClements DJ
    Food Chem; 2021 Dec; 364():130439. PubMed ID: 34186477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein digestibility evaluations of meat and fish substrates using laboratory, avian, and ileally cannulated dog assays.
    Faber TA; Bechtel PJ; Hernot DC; Parsons CM; Swanson KS; Smiley S; Fahey GC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(4):1421-32. PubMed ID: 20023140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative quantification of pork and beef in meat products using global and species-specific peptide markers for the authentication of meat composition.
    Nalazek-Rudnicka K; Kłosowska-Chomiczewska IE; Brockmeyer J; Wasik A; Macierzanka A
    Food Chem; 2022 Sep; 389():133066. PubMed ID: 35567862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro digestion mimicking conditions in young and elderly reveals marked differences between profiles and potential bioactivity of peptides from meat and soy proteins.
    Wang C; Zhao F; Bai Y; Li C; Xu X; Kristiansen K; Zhou G
    Food Res Int; 2022 Jul; 157():111215. PubMed ID: 35761537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peptidomics Study of Plant-Based Meat Analogs as a Source of Bioactive Peptides.
    Wang S; Zhao M; Fan H; Wu J
    Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36900588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fresh Pork as Protein Source in the USDA Thrifty Food Plan 2021: A Modeling Analysis of Lowest-Cost Healthy Diets.
    Poinsot R; Maillot M; Drewnowski A
    Nutrients; 2023 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 37111116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooking affects pork proteins in vitro rate of digestion due to different structural and chemical modifications.
    Mitra B; Kristensen L; Lametsch R; Ruiz-Carrascal J
    Meat Sci; 2022 Oct; 192():108924. PubMed ID: 35878433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of gastrointestinal alterations mimicking elderly conditions on in vitro digestion of meat and soy proteins.
    Wang C; Zhao F; Bai Y; Li C; Xu X; Kristiansen K; Zhou G
    Food Chem; 2022 Jul; 383():132465. PubMed ID: 35183956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspective: The Place of Pork Meat in Sustainable Healthy Diets.
    Drewnowski A
    Adv Nutr; 2024 May; 15(5):100213. PubMed ID: 38508316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro digestibility and solubility of phosphorus of three plant-based meat analogues.
    Wehrmaker AM; de Groot W; Jan van der Goot A; Keppler JK; Bosch G
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2024 May; 108 Suppl 1():24-35. PubMed ID: 38576126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of in vitro digestibility and DIAAR between vegan and meat burgers before and after grilling.
    Sousa R; Portmann R; Recio I; Dubois S; Egger L
    Food Res Int; 2023 Apr; 166():112569. PubMed ID: 36914338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chemometric Analysis of Fatty Acid Composition of Raw Chicken, Beef, and Pork Meat with Plant Extract Addition during Refrigerated Storage.
    Muzolf-Panek M; Kaczmarek A
    Molecules; 2021 Aug; 26(16):. PubMed ID: 34443539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molecularly imprinted polymer nanogel-based fluorescence sensing of pork contamination in halal meat extracts.
    Cheubong C; Takano E; Kitayama Y; Sunayama H; Minamoto K; Takeuchi R; Furutani S; Takeuchi T
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2021 Jan; 172():112775. PubMed ID: 33160232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.