424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35413680)
1. Mechanical properties of polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for hybrid 3D-bioprinting with alginate-gelatin hydrogel.
Koch F; Thaden O; Conrad S; Tröndle K; Finkenzeller G; Zengerle R; Kartmann S; Zimmermann S; Koltay P
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jun; 130():105219. PubMed ID: 35413680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational investigation of interface printing patterns within 3D printed multilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.
Choe R; Devoy E; Kuzemchak B; Sherry M; Jabari E; Packer JD; Fisher JP
Biofabrication; 2022 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35120345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-bioprinting of aortic valve interstitial cells: impact of hydrogel and printing parameters on cell viability.
Immohr MB; Dos Santos Adrego F; Teichert HL; Schmidt V; Sugimura Y; Bauer S; Barth M; Lichtenberg A; Akhyari P
Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 36322974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Invitro and Invivo Study of PCL-Hydrogel Scaffold to Advance Bioprinting Translation in Microtia Reconstruction.
Mukherjee P; Chung J; Cheng K; Gupta R; Haag H; Williams Z; Wallace G
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1931-1936. PubMed ID: 33177423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting.
Giuseppe MD; Law N; Webb B; A Macrae R; Liew LJ; Sercombe TB; Dilley RJ; Doyle BJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Mar; 79():150-157. PubMed ID: 29304429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reinforcing interpenetrating network hydrogels with 3D printed polymer networks to engineer cartilage mimetic composites.
Schipani R; Scheurer S; Florentin R; Critchley SE; Kelly DJ
Biofabrication; 2020 May; 12(3):035011. PubMed ID: 32252045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D Printed Chitosan Composite Scaffold for Chondrocytes Differentiation.
Sahai N; Gogoi M; Tewari RP
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(7):832-842. PubMed ID: 33334294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment.
Zhang K; Fu Q; Yoo J; Chen X; Chandra P; Mo X; Song L; Atala A; Zhao W
Acta Biomater; 2017 Mar; 50():154-164. PubMed ID: 27940192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D hybrid printing platform for auricular cartilage reconstruction.
Chung JHY; Kade JC; Jeiranikhameneh A; Ruberu K; Mukherjee P; Yue Z; Wallace GG
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Mar; 6(3):035003. PubMed ID: 33438648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An additive manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering.
Kundu J; Shim JH; Jang J; Kim SW; Cho DW
J Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2015 Nov; 9(11):1286-97. PubMed ID: 23349081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chondroinductive Alginate-Based Hydrogels Having Graphene Oxide for 3D Printed Scaffold Fabrication.
Olate-Moya F; Arens L; Wilhelm M; Mateos-Timoneda MA; Engel E; Palza H
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Jan; 12(4):4343-4357. PubMed ID: 31909967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D bioprinting of a stem cell-laden, multi-material tubular composite: An approach for spinal cord repair.
Hamid OA; Eltaher HM; Sottile V; Yang J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jan; 120():111707. PubMed ID: 33545866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional bioprinting of cell-laden constructs with polycaprolactone protective layers for using various thermoplastic polymers.
Kim BS; Jang J; Chae S; Gao G; Kong JS; Ahn M; Cho DW
Biofabrication; 2016 Aug; 8(3):035013. PubMed ID: 27550946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alginate dependent changes of physical properties in 3D bioprinted cell-laden porous scaffolds affect cell viability and cell morphology.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Vetsch JR; Paul GR; Rubert M; Müller R
Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 14(6):065009. PubMed ID: 31426033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of different bioinks for 3D bioprinting of fibrocartilage and hyaline cartilage.
Daly AC; Critchley SE; Rencsok EM; Kelly DJ
Biofabrication; 2016 Oct; 8(4):045002. PubMed ID: 27716628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D Bioprinting of a Bioactive Composite Scaffold for Cell Delivery in Periodontal Tissue Regeneration.
Miao G; Liang L; Li W; Ma C; Pan Y; Zhao H; Zhang Q; Xiao Y; Yang X
Biomolecules; 2023 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37509098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel bioprinting method and system for forming hybrid tissue engineering constructs.
Shanjani Y; Pan CC; Elomaa L; Yang Y
Biofabrication; 2015 Dec; 7(4):045008. PubMed ID: 26685102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering.
Contessi Negrini N; Celikkin N; Tarsini P; Farè S; Święszkowski W
Biofabrication; 2020 Jan; 12(2):025001. PubMed ID: 31715587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation.
Wu Z; Su X; Xu Y; Kong B; Sun W; Mi S
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24474. PubMed ID: 27091175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
