These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35413840)

  • 1. Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies.
    Hammel C; Pandis N; Pieper D; Faggion CM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):110. PubMed ID: 35413840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study.
    Menne MC; Su N; Faggion CM
    Ir Vet J; 2023 Dec; 76(1):33. PubMed ID: 38098065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Pulikkotil SJ; Alatta A; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2022 May; 55(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 35080025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with meta-analyses focusing on traumatic dental injuries: A cross-sectional study.
    Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Gopinath VK; Narasimhan S; Duncan HF; Levin L; Abbott PV; Dummer PMH
    Dent Traumatol; 2023 Dec; 39(6):637-646. PubMed ID: 37594908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
    Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study.
    Karakasis P; Bougioukas KI; Pamporis K; Fragakis N; Haidich AB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):213-226. PubMed ID: 37956538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
    Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Bodyweight Management Strategies for Children and Adolescents.
    Ho RS; Chui KY; Huang WY; Wong SH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2023 May; 55(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 36728305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR.
    Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarities, reliability and gaps in assessing the quality of conduct of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS: systematic survey of nutrition reviews.
    Swierz MJ; Storman D; Zajac J; Koperny M; Weglarz P; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach A; Kaluzinska K; Bochenek-Cibor J; Johnston BC; Bala MM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):261. PubMed ID: 34837960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
    O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of Higher Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Nutrition and Cancer Prevention.
    Storman D; Koperny M; Zając J; Polak M; Weglarz P; Bochenek-Cibor J; Swierz MJ; Staskiewicz W; Gorecka M; Skuza A; Wach AA; Kaluzinska K; Bała MM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS).
    Sequeira-Byron P; Fedorowicz Z; Jagannath VA; Sharif MO
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 21986647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
    Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Hofer SOP; Lista F; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e3897. PubMed ID: 34815919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery-How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review.
    Sathish M; Eswar R
    Global Spine J; 2021 Apr; 11(3):378-399. PubMed ID: 32875866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.