121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35414034)
1. Diagnostic potential of radiological apical tumor involvement.
Liebert C; Morka N; Satish P; Freeman A; Kelly D; Kirkham A; Orczyk C; Simpson BS; Whitaker HC; Emberton M; Norris JM
J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):705-706. PubMed ID: 35414034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The detection rate of apical tumour involvement on preoperative MRI and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Veerman H; Boellaard TN; van Leeuwen PJ; Vis AN; Bekers E; Hoeks C; Schoots IG; van der Poel HG
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 34783953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Structured Report Informs Risk for Positive Apical Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy.
Costa DN; Meng X; Tverye A; Bagrodia A; Recchimuzzi DZ; Xi Y; Arraj P; Shah RB; Subramanian N; de Leon AD; Roehrborn CG; Rofsky NM; Chen H; Pedrosa I
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 47(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 35995580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Marcq G; Michelet A; Hannink G; Rizk J; Sauvain J; Villers A; Saffarini M; Rochat CH
BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.
Fan B; Zhang L; Wang Y; Dai Z; Pan H; Xie J; Wang H; Xin Z; Wang Y; Duan X; Luo J; Wang L; Liu Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1228892. PubMed ID: 37859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI versus non-MRI diagnostic pathways before radical prostatectomy: Impact on nerve-sparing, positive surgical margins, and biochemical recurrence.
Patel HD; Okabe Y; Rac G; Pahouja G; Desai S; Shea SM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Gupta GN
Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):104.e19-104.e27. PubMed ID: 36372633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does intraoperative frozen section really predict significant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy? A retrospective study.
Choi SY; Chi BH; Kim TH; Lim B; Lee W; You D; Kim CS
Asian J Androl; 2021; 23(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 32362599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months.
Abdel Raheem A; Chang KD; Alenzi MJ; Ham WS; Han WK; Choi YD; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1006-1014. PubMed ID: 30276864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative multiparametric MRI does not lower positive surgical margin rate in a large series of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Gietelink L; Jansen BHE; Oprea-Lager DE; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; Vis AN
J Robot Surg; 2022 Apr; 16(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 33811618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative staging using magnetic resonance imaging and risk of positive surgical margins after prostate-cancer surgery.
Jäderling F; Akre O; Aly M; Björklund J; Olsson M; Adding C; Öberg M; Blomqvist L; Nyberg T; Wiklund P; Carlsson S
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Sep; 22(3):391-398. PubMed ID: 30504811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
Bravi CA; Tin A; Vertosick E; Mazzone E; Martini A; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Gallina A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Vickers A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30747873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Rosenberg JE; Jung JH; Edgerton Z; Lee H; Lee S; Bakker CJ; Dahm P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD013641. PubMed ID: 32813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
