168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35414687)
1. Evaluation of dental caries detection with quantitative light-induced fluorescence in comparison to different field of view devices.
Oh SH; Choi JY; Kim SH
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6139. PubMed ID: 35414687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of Dental Caries and Cracks with Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence in Comparison to Radiographic and Visual Examination: A Retrospective Case Study.
Oh SH; Lee SR; Choi JY; Choi YS; Kim SH; Yoon HC; Nelson G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33802443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative light-induced fluorescence in detection of dental caries of primary teeth.
Cho KH; Kang CM; Jung HI; Lee HS; Lee K; Lee TY; Song JS
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103845. PubMed ID: 34637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fluorescence parameters between three generations of QLF devices for detecting enamel caries in vitro and on smooth surfaces.
Park SW; Kim SK; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():142-147. PubMed ID: 30508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods.
Jallad M; Zero D; Eckert G; Ferreira Zandona A
Caries Res; 2015; 49(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 26316073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring enamel caries on resin-treated occlusal surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: an in vitro study.
Silva FG; Freitas PM; Mendes FM; de Novaes TF; Diniz MB; Oliveira Guaré R
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32382936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth caries classification with quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images using convolutional neural network for permanent teeth in vivo.
Park EY; Jeong S; Kang S; Cho J; Cho JY; Kim EK
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):981. PubMed ID: 38066624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the detection of approximal caries in vitro.
Ko HY; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 25724115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a fluorescence-image scoring system for assessing noncavitated occlusal caries.
Jung EH; Lee ES; Jung HI; Kang SM; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2018 Mar; 21():36-42. PubMed ID: 29102651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal caries detection on 3D models obtained with an intraoral scanner. A validation study.
Ntovas P; Michou S; Benetti AR; Bakhshandeh A; Ekstrand K; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104457. PubMed ID: 36858167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new screening method to detect proximal dental caries using fluorescence imaging.
Kim ES; Lee ES; Kang SM; Jung EH; de Josselin de Jong E; Jung HI; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2017 Dec; 20():257-262. PubMed ID: 29079349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro performance of different methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Gomez J; Zakian C; Salsone S; Pinto SC; Taylor A; Pretty IA; Ellwood R
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 23146817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.
Ando M; van Der Veen MH; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11799288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of light-emitting diode device in detecting occlusal caries in the primary molars.
Diniz MB; Campos PH; Wilde S; Cordeiro RCL; Zandona AGF
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 34(6):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 30673922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caries lesions diagnosis with deep convolutional neural network in intraoral QLF images by handheld device.
Tan R; Zhu X; Chen S; Zhang J; Liu Z; Li Z; Fan H; Wang X; Yang L
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):754. PubMed ID: 38951770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro performance of QLF system and conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries around tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
Lenzi TL; Piovesan C; Mendes FM; Braga MM; Raggio DP
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Jan; 26(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25604208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement technology for early caries detection.
Amaechi BT; Ramalingam K
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 25000670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to assess lesion depth in cavitated and non-cavitated root caries lesions - An in vitro study.
Kreher D; Park KJ; Schmalz G; Schulz-Kornas E; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102675. PubMed ID: 34906738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the Light-induced Fluorescent Intraoral Camera in Occlusal Caries Detection.
Alzayyat NA; Hafez RM; Yassen AA; Ibrahim SH
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 34267005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
