These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35416598)

  • 1. In vitro comparative analysis of scanning accuracy of intraoral and laboratory scanners in measuring the distance between multiple implants.
    Natsubori R; Fukazawa S; Chiba T; Tanabe N; Kihara H; Kondo H
    Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Apr; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 35416598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners.
    Fukazawa S; Odaira C; Kondo H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Oct; 61(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 28216020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
    Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature].
    Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions: Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch.
    Tan MY; Yee SHX; Wong KM; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):366–380. PubMed ID: 30521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of the Position Accuracy of Implant Abutments Reproduced by Intra-Oral Optical Impression.
    Ajioka H; Kihara H; Odaira C; Kobayashi T; Kondo H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164048. PubMed ID: 27706225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners.
    Flügge TV; Att W; Metzger MC; Nelson K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 27148990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study.
    Andriessen FS; Rijkens DR; van der Meer WJ; Wismeijer DW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 24210732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Li H; Yamada S; Matsuoka T; Ono S; Nakano T
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 33829613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: An In Vitro Study.
    Zhang XY; Cao Y; Hu ZW; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun YC
    Chin J Dent Res; 2022 Sep; 25(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 36102891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review.
    Sanda M; Miyoshi K; Baba K
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Jul; 7(1):97. PubMed ID: 34312701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy between intraoral and extraoral scanning: Three-dimensional deviation and effect of distance between implants from two scanning methods.
    Pereira ALC; Segundo HVM; Júnior LCA; Germano AR; Carreiro ADFP
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 36511059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study.
    Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Scanned Stock Abutments Using Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Kim JE; Hong YS; Kang YJ; Kim JH; Shim JS
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Aug; 28(7):797-803. PubMed ID: 31250506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.