136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35417257)
1. A TMS-induced cortical silent period delays the contralateral limb for bimanual symmetrical movements and the reaction time delay is reduced on startle trials.
Teku F; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2022 May; 127(5):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 35417257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.
Alibiglou L; MacKinnon CD
J Physiol; 2012 Feb; 590(4):919-36. PubMed ID: 22124142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.
Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Hajj J; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2019 May; 121(5):1809-1821. PubMed ID: 30864866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
Smith V; Carlsen AN
Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motor control in simple bimanual movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and reaction time study.
Foltys H; Sparing R; Boroojerdi B; Krings T; Meister IG; Mottaghy FM; Töpper R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 112(2):265-74. PubMed ID: 11165528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A startling acoustic stimulation (SAS)-TMS approach to assess the reticulospinal system in healthy and stroke subjects.
Chen YT; Li S; Zhou P; Li S
J Neurol Sci; 2019 Apr; 399():82-88. PubMed ID: 30782527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.
Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 22138667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of combined cortical and acoustic stimuli on muscle activity.
Fisher RJ; Sharott A; Kühn AA; Brown P
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 157(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14968278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of conditioning startling acoustic stimulation (SAS) on the corticospinal motor system: a SAS-TMS study.
Chen YT; Li S; Zhou P; Li S
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):1973-1980. PubMed ID: 31143970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on bimanual movements.
Chen JT; Lin YY; Shan DE; Wu ZA; Hallett M; Liao KK
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 93(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 15331622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating motor preparation in synchronous hand and foot movements under reactive vs. predictive control.
Bui A; Maslovat D; Lajoie Y; Carlsen AN
Exp Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 241(4):1041-1052. PubMed ID: 36869897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the effect of anticipating a startling acoustic stimulus on preparatory inhibition.
Grandjean J; Quoilin C; Duque J
Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Apr; 49(2):137-147. PubMed ID: 30528379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The timing and intensity of transcranial magnetic stimulation, and the scalp site stimulated, as variables influencing motor sequence performance in healthy subjects.
Gregori B; Currà A; Dinapoli L; Bologna M; Accornero N; Berardelli A
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15887005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
