These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35418035)

  • 1. Comparisons of six endoscopy independent scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes for elderly and younger patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Li Y; Lu Q; Song M; Wu K; Ou X
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):187. PubMed ID: 35418035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Six Preendoscopy Scoring Systems to Predict Outcomes for Older Adults with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Li Y; Lu Q; Wu K; Ou X
    Gastroenterol Res Pract; 2022; 2022():9334866. PubMed ID: 35136407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
    Liu S; Zhang X; Walline JH; Yu X; Zhu H
    J Transl Int Med; 2021 Jun; 9(2):114-122. PubMed ID: 34497750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of risk scoring systems for critical care patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predicting mortality and length of stay.
    Lincoln M; Keating N; O'Loughlin C; Tam A; O'Kane M; MacCarthy F; O'Connor E
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2022; 54(4):310-314. PubMed ID: 36345924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of the ABC Score to Other Risk Stratification Scales in Managing High-risk Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Kherad O; Restellini S; Almadi M; Martel M; Barkun AN
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 May-Jun 01; 57(5):479-485. PubMed ID: 37022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.