These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35420855)
1. Waldian t tests: Sequential Bayesian t tests with controlled error probabilities. Schnuerch M; Heck DW; Erdfelder E Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 35420855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests. Sanborn AN; Hills TT Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 24101570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of issues about null hypothesis Bayesian testing. Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):774-795. PubMed ID: 31094544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Worked-out examples of the adequacy of Bayesian optional stopping. Tendeiro JN; Kiers HAL; van Ravenzwaaij D Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Feb; 29(1):70-87. PubMed ID: 34254263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP. Kelter R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32503439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research. Kelter R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 32321438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP. Quintana DS; Williams DR BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research. Kelter R BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 34404344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs. Stallard N; Todd S; Ryan EG; Gates S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31910813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design? Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Schönbrodt FD; Wagenmakers EJ; Zehetleitner M; Perugini M Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):322-339. PubMed ID: 26651986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optional stopping: no problem for Bayesians. Rouder JN Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 24659049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation. Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test. Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian designs with frequentist and Bayesian error rate considerations. Wang YG; Leung DH; Li M; Tan SB Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):445-56. PubMed ID: 16248347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ordering genes: controlling the decision-error probabilities. Rogatko A; Zacks S Am J Hum Genet; 1993 May; 52(5):947-57. PubMed ID: 8488844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology. Pramanik S; Johnson VE Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):243-261. PubMed ID: 35420854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]