154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35421852)
21. Retinal and Cortical Contributions to Phosphenes During Transcranial Electrical Current Stimulation.
Evans ID; Palmisano S; Croft RJ
Bioelectromagnetics; 2021 Feb; 42(2):146-158. PubMed ID: 33440463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.
Sabel BA; Kresinsky A; Cardenas-Morales L; Haueisen J; Hunold A; Dannhauer M; Antal A
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():2133-2141. PubMed ID: 34648453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of gamma tACS over the M1 region and cerebellar hemisphere does not depend on current intensity.
Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Kojima S; Yokota H; Saito K; Inukai Y; Onishi H
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 65():54-58. PubMed ID: 30954355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Frequency-dependent modulation of cerebellar excitability during the application of non-invasive alternating current stimulation.
Spampinato D; Avci E; Rothwell J; Rocchi L
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 33482375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation.
Turi Z; Ambrus GG; Janacsek K; Emmert K; Hahn L; Paulus W; Antal A
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2013; 31(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 23478342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates spontaneous low frequency fluctuations as measured with fMRI.
Cabral-Calderin Y; Williams KA; Opitz A; Dechent P; Wilke M
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():88-107. PubMed ID: 27393419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phosphene Attributes Depend on Frequency and Intensity of Retinal tACS.
Kvašňák E; Orendáčová M; Vránová J
Physiol Res; 2022 Aug; 71(4):561-571. PubMed ID: 35770470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficiently searching through large tACS parameter spaces using closed-loop Bayesian optimization.
Lorenz R; Simmons LE; Monti RP; Arthur JL; Limal S; Laakso I; Leech R; Violante IR
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 31289013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation.
Batsikadze G; Rezaee Z; Chang DI; Gerwig M; Herlitze S; Dutta A; Nitsche MA; Timmann D
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 31040077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Montage matters: the influence of transcranial alternating current stimulation on human physiological tremor.
Mehta AR; Pogosyan A; Brown P; Brittain JS
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 25499037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects on motor learning of transcranial alternating current stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex and cerebellar hemisphere.
Miyaguchi S; Inukai Y; Matsumoto Y; Miyashita M; Takahashi R; Otsuru N; Onishi H
J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 78():296-300. PubMed ID: 32402616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mini-review: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and the Cerebellum.
Wessel MJ; Draaisma LR; Hummel FC
Cerebellum; 2023 Feb; 22(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 35060078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cerebellar Lobules Optimal Stimulation (CLOS): A Computational Pipeline to Optimize Cerebellar Lobule-Specific Electric Field Distribution.
Rezaee Z; Dutta A
Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():266. PubMed ID: 31031578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electric field envelope focality in superficial brain areas with linear alignment montage in temporal interference stimulation.
Hirata A; Akazawa Y; Kodera S; Otsuru N; Laakso I
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 178():108697. PubMed ID: 38850958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Ramaraju S; Roula MA; McCarthy PW
J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016019. PubMed ID: 28925375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation on the cerebellum and supplementary motor area improves bimanual motor skill.
Miyaguchi S; Inukai Y; Mitsumoto S; Otsuru N; Onishi H
Behav Brain Res; 2022 Apr; 424():113805. PubMed ID: 35182606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A computational pipeline to find lobule-specific electric field distribution during non-invasive cerebellar stimulation.
Rezaee Z; Ruszala B; Dutta A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2019 Jun; 2019():1191-1196. PubMed ID: 31374791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates human gait rhythm.
Koganemaru S; Mikami Y; Matsuhashi M; Truong DQ; Bikson M; Kansaku K; Mima T
Neurosci Res; 2020 Jul; 156():265-270. PubMed ID: 31812652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gamma tACS over M1 and cerebellar hemisphere improves motor performance in a phase-specific manner.
Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Kojima S; Yokota H; Saito K; Inukai Y; Onishi H
Neurosci Lett; 2019 Feb; 694():64-68. PubMed ID: 30445151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Investigating the effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on primary somatosensory cortex.
Manzo N; Guerra A; Giangrosso M; Belvisi D; Leodori G; Berardelli A; Conte A
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17129. PubMed ID: 33051523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
