133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35421915)
21. Safety and patients' satisfaction after hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Cabezas-Palacios MN; Jiménez-Caraballo A; Tato-Varela S; Sánchez-Sánchez A; Romero-Díaz C; Carrasco-Gallego A; Zapardiel-Gutiérrez I
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):377-381. PubMed ID: 29046105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
Lannon BM; Lee SY
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can laparoscopic removal of Essure device before embryo transfer correct poor reproductive outcome pattern in IVF? A case report.
Salem SA; Peck AC; Salem RD; Sills ES
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 24779258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Novel Technique for Essure Reversal.
Clark NV; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30846897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ASIA (Shoenfeld's syndrome) due to hysteroscopic Essure sterilization.
Chauhan U; Cassidy B; Cohen Tervaert JW
Autoimmun Rev; 2021 Dec; 20(12):102979. PubMed ID: 34752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Essure® and chronic pelvic pain: a population-based cohort.
Arjona Berral JE; Rodríguez Jiménez B; Velasco Sánchez E; Povedano Cañizares B; Monserrat Jordan J; Lorente Gonzalez J; Castelo-Branco C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Nov; 34(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 24910944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ICSI pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic placement of Essure devices for hydrosalpinx in laparoscopic contraindicated patients.
Ozgur K; Bulut H; Berkkanoglu M; Coetzee K; Kaya G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 24813749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Imaging findings in Essure-related complications: a pictorial review.
Djeffal H; Blouet M; Pizzoferato AC; Vardon D; Belloy F; Pelage JP
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170686. PubMed ID: 29927633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization.
van Limburg Stirum EVJ; Clark NV; Lindsey A; Gu X; Thurkow AL; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
JSLS; 2020; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 32206011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Two Surgical Techniques for Essure Device Ablation: The Hysteroscopic Way and the Laparoscopic Way by Salpingectomy with Tubal Interstitial Resection.
Tissot M; Petry S; Lecointre L; Faller E; Baldauf JJ; Akladios C; Boisrame T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):603. PubMed ID: 30064007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Release of metal elements from the Essure implant: A prospective cohort study.
Parant F; Bost M; Nohuz E; Prost J; Cerruto E; Moret S; Maurin J; Chene G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Jun; 273():20-25. PubMed ID: 35447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Essure Surgical Removal and Subsequent Resolution of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Lora Alcantara I; Rezai S; Kirby C; Chadee A; Henderson CE; Elmadjian M
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol; 2016; 2016():6961202. PubMed ID: 26904330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the essure tubal sterilization procedure and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Thiel JA; Carson GD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2008 Jul; 30(7):581-585. PubMed ID: 18644179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.
Duffy S; Marsh F; Rogerson L; Hudson H; Cooper K; Jack S; Hunter D; Philips G
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 16225573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tubal perforation by Essure: three different clinical presentations.
Langenveld J; Veersema S; Bongers MY; Koks CA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):2011.e5-10. PubMed ID: 18692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [How I do… laparoscopic removal of Essure
Chene G; Vidican P; Azzi C; Carval KL; Chabert P; Beaufils E; Mellier G; Lamblin G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 May; 45(5):316-319. PubMed ID: 28461235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hysteroscopic Essure Inserts for Permanent Contraception: Extended Follow-Up Results of a Phase III Multicenter International Study.
Chudnoff SG; Nichols JE; Levie M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):951-60. PubMed ID: 25917278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
