These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35422153)

  • 1. The Role of Prosody in Disambiguating English Indirect Requests.
    Trott S; Reed S; Kaliblotzky D; Ferreira V; Bergen B
    Lang Speech; 2023 Mar; 66(1):118-142. PubMed ID: 35422153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function.
    Sicoli MA; Stivers T; Enfield NJ; Levinson SC
    Lang Speech; 2015 Jun; 58(Pt 2):204-23. PubMed ID: 26677643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance.
    Vergis N; Jiang X; Pell MD
    Brain Res; 2020 Aug; 1740():146855. PubMed ID: 32348774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
    Schuster S; Degen J
    Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence.
    Mauchand M; Caballero JA; Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 21(1):74-92. PubMed ID: 33420711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
    Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences.
    Nagel HN; Shapiro LP; Nawy R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1994 Nov; 23(6):473-85. PubMed ID: 7996508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of prosodic boundaries on comprehension of spoken English sentences.
    Blasko DG; Hall MD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 9760620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond the language given: the neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning.
    Bašnáková J; Weber K; Petersson KM; van Berkum J; Hagoort P
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2572-8. PubMed ID: 23645715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.
    Baek H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):158. PubMed ID: 35105020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody.
    Xie X; Buxó-Lugo A; Kurumada C
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104619. PubMed ID: 33601018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3-year-old children make relevance inferences in indirect verbal communication.
    Schulze C; Grassmann S; Tomasello M
    Child Dev; 2013; 84(6):2079-93. PubMed ID: 23550944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
    Pickering MJ; Gambi C
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Oct; 144(10):1002-1044. PubMed ID: 29952584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Persistence of Initial Misanalysis With No Referential Ambiguity.
    Nakamura C; Arai M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):909-40. PubMed ID: 26190480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing priming for prosodic representations: Speaking rate, intonational phrase boundaries, and pitch accenting.
    Tooley KM; Konopka AE; Watson DG
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):625-641. PubMed ID: 29349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
    Kallio H; Suni A; Šimko J
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):571-597. PubMed ID: 34479458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.
    Vaughn CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3218. PubMed ID: 31153344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
    Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers.
    Ip MHK; Cutler A
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):650-680. PubMed ID: 34841933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.