142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35425627)
1. What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences.
Bottesini JG; Rhemtulla M; Vazire S
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 9(4):200048. PubMed ID: 35425627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
Wicherts JM
Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spanish Scientists' Opinion about Science and Researcher Behavior.
Frias-Navarro D; Pascual-Soler M; Perezgonzalez J; Monterde-I-Bort H; Pascual-Llobell J
Span J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 24():e7. PubMed ID: 33541458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making.
Maggio LA; Artino AR; Watling CJ; Driessen EW; O'Brien BC
Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 53(12):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 31475382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation.
Olsen J; Mosen J; Voracek M; Kirchler E
R Soc Open Sci; 2019 Dec; 6(12):190738. PubMed ID: 31903199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing an open science 'mindset'.
Hagger MS
Health Psychol Behav Med; 2022; 10(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 34993003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0.
Spellman BA
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):886-99. PubMed ID: 26581743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants.
Houghton G; Kingdon C; Dower M; Shakur-Still H; Alfirevic Z
BJOG; 2018 Dec; 125(13):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 29911309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Bakker M; Elsherif M; Wong TK; Wicherts JM
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37950113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Researcher and study participants' perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam.
Van Nuil JI; Nguyen TTT; Le Nguyen TN; Nguyen VVC; Chambers M; Ta TDN; Merson L; Nguyen TPD; Hoang MTV; Parker M; Bull S; Kestelyn E
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 31924199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data? A cross-sectional survey.
Hamilton DG; Everitt S; Page MJ; Fidler F
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38708950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology society.
Kwasnicka D; Ten Hoor GA; van Dongen A; Gruszczyńska E; Hagger MS; Hamilton K; Hankonen N; Heino MTJ; Kotzur M; Noone C; Rothman AJ; Toomey E; Warner LM; Kok G; Peters GJ; Luszczynska A
Health Psychol Rev; 2021 Sep; 15(3):333-349. PubMed ID: 33198583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pitfalls in the statistical world].
Kiese-Himmel C; Plontke SK
HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 31501916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the publishing priorities and preferences among STEM researchers at a large R1 institution.
Ali I; Burton J; Tranfield MW
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16316. PubMed ID: 37229162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
