314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35426046)
21. Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices.
Morrison VA; Wong M; Hershman D; Campos LT; Ding B; Malin J
J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 May; 13(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 17506600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a novel medical device for pegfilgrastim administration.
Aruga T; Doihara H; Yanagita Y; Ishida T; Yamashita T; Uehara K; Taira T; Tsurutani J; Takeshita T; Tsuyuki S; Kaneko K; Ohtake T; Yamaguchi Y; Hara Y; Saji S
Cancer Sci; 2022 May; 113(5):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 35293085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Real-world febrile neutropenia rates with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Kitchen K; Mosier MC
Future Oncol; 2022 Jul; 18(23):2551-2560. PubMed ID: 35708316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient, nurse, and physician preferences: final results of the CONVENIENCE study evaluating pegfilgrastim prophylaxis via pre-filled syringe or on-body injector in cancer patients.
Metz M; Semsek D; Rogmans G; Hutzschenreuter U; Fietz T; Harde J; Zacharias S; Hielscher C; Lorenz A; Zahn MO; Guth D; Liebers S; Berghorn M; Grebhardt S; Matillon CD; Egerer G; Potthoff K
Support Care Cancer; 2021 Nov; 29(11):6633-6643. PubMed ID: 33956213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of eflapegrastim to pegfilgrastim in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (RECOVER): A Phase 3 study.
Cobb PW; Moon YW; Mezei K; Láng I; Bhat G; Chawla S; Hasal SJ; Schwartzberg LS
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6234-6243. PubMed ID: 32687266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A single-arm, retrospective analysis of the incidence of febrile neutropenia using same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim in patients with gastrointestinal cancers treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI.
Eckstrom J; Bartels T; Abraham I; Patel H; Elquza E; Scott AJ; Malangone S; Hollings J; McBride A
Support Care Cancer; 2019 Mar; 27(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 30090991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Pegfilgrastim On-body Injector in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Requiring Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Support.
Patel J; Rainess RA; Benfield MJ; Rogers KML; Moore DC; Larck C; Arnall JR
Hosp Pharm; 2021 Apr; 56(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 33790481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A retrospective review of the real-world experience of the Pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Lapelga®) to the reference biologic (Neulasta®).
Wong G; Zhang L; Majeed H; Razvi Y; DeAngelis C; Lam E; McKenzie E; Wang K; Pasetka M
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2022 Jan; 28(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 33215563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review.
Gebremariam GT; Fentie AM; Beyene K; Sander B; Gebretekle GB
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1600. PubMed ID: 36585648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09.
Lee KH; Kim JY; Lee MH; Han HS; Lim JH; Park KU; Park IH; Cho EK; Yoon SY; Kim JH; Choi IS; Park JH; Choi YJ; Kim HJ; Jung KH; Kim SY; Oh DY; Im SA
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1709-17. PubMed ID: 26423618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.
von Minckwitz G; Kümmel S; du Bois A; Eiermann W; Eidtmann H; Gerber B; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Costa SD; Jackisch C; Grasshoff ST; Vescia S; Skacel T; Loibl S; Mehta KM; Kaufmann M;
Ann Oncol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 17846019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
Weycker D; Li X; Figueredo J; Barron R; Tzivelekis S; Hagiwara M
Support Care Cancer; 2016 May; 24(5):2309-2316. PubMed ID: 26607482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Real-world data analysis of perioperative chemotherapy patterns, G-CSF use, and FN status in patients with early breast cancer.
Shibata N; Yoshinami T; Tamaki K; Nukada T; Ohno S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Sep; 201(2):265-273. PubMed ID: 37410318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
