200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35426059)
1. Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.
Yamaguchi K; Templin J
Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1390-1421. PubMed ID: 35426059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model.
Yamaguchi K; Okada K
Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):973-995. PubMed ID: 33420895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sequential Gibbs Sampling Algorithm for Cognitive Diagnosis Models with Many Attributes.
Wang J; Shi N; Zhang X; Xu G
Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):840-858. PubMed ID: 33755507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Gibbs-INLA algorithm for multidimensional graded response model analysis.
Lin X; Zhang S; Tang Y; Li X
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):169-195. PubMed ID: 37772696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A sequential exploratory diagnostic model using a Pólya-gamma data augmentation strategy.
Jimenez A; Balamuta JJ; Culpepper SA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):513-538. PubMed ID: 37786373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extending exploratory diagnostic classification models: Inferring the effect of covariates.
Yigit HD; Culpepper SA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):372-401. PubMed ID: 36601975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variational Bayes inference for hidden Markov diagnostic classification models.
Yamaguchi K; Martinez AJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 37249065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conjugate Gibbs sampling for Bayesian phylogenetic models.
Lartillot N
J Comput Biol; 2006 Dec; 13(10):1701-22. PubMed ID: 17238840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Particle Gibbs sampling for Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
Wang S; Wang L
Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 33045053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of genetic parameters.
Mathew B; Bauer AM; Koistinen P; Reetz TC; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Oct; 109(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22805656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions.
Turner BM; Sederberg PB; Brown SD; Steyvers M
Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):368-84. PubMed ID: 23646991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. P- and T-wave delineation in ECG signals using a Bayesian approach and a partially collapsed Gibbs sampler.
Lin C; Mailhes C; Tourneret JY
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2840-9. PubMed ID: 20851787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling to item-response theory modeling of multi-symptom genetic data.
Eaves L; Erkanli A; Silberg J; Angold A; Maes HH; Foley D
Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):765-80. PubMed ID: 16273316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian analysis of longitudinal binary responses based on the multivariate probit model: A comparison of five methods.
Lu K; Chen F
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2261-2286. PubMed ID: 36128906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. JAGS model specification for spatiotemporal epidemiological modelling.
Lope DJ; Demirhan H
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 49():100645. PubMed ID: 38876555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple introduction to Markov Chain Monte-Carlo sampling.
van Ravenzwaaij D; Cassey P; Brown SD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):143-154. PubMed ID: 26968853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laplacian-P-splines for Bayesian inference in the mixture cure model.
Gressani O; Faes C; Hens N
Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2602-2626. PubMed ID: 35699121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and No-U-Turn Sampler for estimating genetic parameters and breeding values.
Nishio M; Arakawa A
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):73. PubMed ID: 31823719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating uncertainty in MRF-based image segmentation: A perfect-MCMC approach.
Awate SP; Garg S; Jena R
Med Image Anal; 2019 Jul; 55():181-196. PubMed ID: 31085445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
