These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 354261)

  • 1. [Impression of tooth-containing jaws by individual trays].
    Marxkors R
    ZWR; 1978 Jul; 87(14):682-4. PubMed ID: 354261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Impression material trays and models in dental technology].
    Ulber G
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1983 Dec; 24(12):521-4. PubMed ID: 6377747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Functional impression, using individual trays, for the restoration of partially edentulous jaws].
    Szóke A; Somogyi E
    Fogorv Sz; 1981 Apr; 74(4):122-4. PubMed ID: 7026297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different labio-lingual spaces in tray designs on the displacement of and pressure against a mobile tooth.
    Nishi Y; Tsuru K; Kishita C; Kamashita Y; Hamano T; Nagaoka E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Sep; 35(9):700-5. PubMed ID: 18793354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A rapid method for readying individual plastic impression trays in preparing prostheses for edentulous jaws].
    Piasetskiĭ IM
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1985; 64(4):55-6. PubMed ID: 3901412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considerations for adhesion of impression materials to impression trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Goldfogel MH; Hoffman W; Bomberg SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Dec; 60(6):681-4. PubMed ID: 3060600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression success using the dual arch technique.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):396-7. PubMed ID: 16366044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Custom sectional impression trays with interlocking type handle for microstomia patients.
    Fernandes AS; Mascarenhas K; Aras MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):370-3. PubMed ID: 19884726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one, all-plastic impression trays.
    Gottlieb M
    Dent Econ; 1996 Jan; 86(1):102-3. PubMed ID: 8612944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individualized erlanger KS-impression trays for infants with cleft lip and palate.
    Strobel-Schwarthoff K; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Mar; 49(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 21269046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elastic impressions using custom acrylic trays.
    Tosti A
    Dent Dig; 1969 Mar; 75(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 4886025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dimensional differences in stone casts from trays made of different materials].
    Pamir AD
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1987 May; 14(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 3331548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.