These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35426735)

  • 1. Exploring the Effects of Standardized Soft Tissue Mobilization on the Viscoelastic Properties, Pressure Pain Thresholds, and Tactile Pressure Thresholds of the Cesarean Section Scar.
    Gilbert I; Gaudreault N; Gaboury I
    J Integr Complement Med; 2022 Apr; 28(4):355-362. PubMed ID: 35426735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and inter-evaluator reliability of the MyotonPRO for the assessment of the viscoelastic properties of caesarean section scar and unscarred skin.
    Gilbert I; Gaudreault N; Gaboury I
    Skin Res Technol; 2021 May; 27(3):370-375. PubMed ID: 33084197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prophylactic use of a topical scar gel containing extract of Allium cepae, allantoin, and heparin improves symptoms and appearance of cesarean-section scars compared with untreated scars.
    Ocampo-Candiani J; Vázquez-Martínez OT; Iglesias Benavides JL; Buske K; Lehn A; Acker C
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 13(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 24509969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chronic caesarian section scar pain treated with fascial scar release techniques: A case series.
    Wasserman JB; Steele-Thornborrow JL; Yuen JS; Halkiotis M; Riggins EM
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2016 Oct; 20(4):906-913. PubMed ID: 27814873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars.
    Kelly-Martin R; Doughty L; Garkavi M; Wasserman JB
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the scar tissue structure after cesarean section as a result of manual therapy.
    Olszewska K; Ptak A; Rusak A; Dębiec-Bąk A; Stefańska M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2024 Apr; 33(4):387-395. PubMed ID: 37665082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
    Osser OV; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19499514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractional CO
    Karmisholt KE; Taudorf EH; Wulff CB; Wenande E; Philipsen PA; Haedersdal M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Feb; 49(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27862066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visibility and measurement of cesarean section scars in pregnancy: a reproducibility study.
    Naji O; Daemen A; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Saso S; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Nov; 40(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 22323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: a video case report.
    Aimi G; Buggio L; Berlanda N; Vercellini P
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):e17-e18. PubMed ID: 28483506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean section scar measurements in non-pregnant women using three-dimensional ultrasound: a repeatability study.
    Glavind J; Madsen LD; Uldbjerg N; Dueholm M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():65-9. PubMed ID: 27064944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the uterine scar stiffness in women with previous Cesarean section by ultrasound elastography: A cohort study.
    di Pasquo E; Kiener AJO; DallAsta A; Commare A; Angeli L; Frusca T; Ghi T
    Clin Imaging; 2020 Aug; 64():53-56. PubMed ID: 32325262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.
    Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 27419374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft tissue mobilization techniques in treating chronic abdominal scar tissue: A quasi-experimental single subject design.
    Kelly RC; Armstrong M; Bensky A; Foti A; Wasserman JB
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2019 Oct; 23(4):805-814. PubMed ID: 31733765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
    Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
    Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.
    Liu S; Sun J; Cai B; Xi X; Yang L; Sun Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):707-11. PubMed ID: 26803916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical diagnosis and therapy of uterine scar defects after caesarean section in non-pregnant women.
    Schepker N; Garcia-Rocha GJ; von Versen-Höynck F; Hillemanns P; Schippert C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1417-23. PubMed ID: 25516174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.