These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35426820)

  • 1. Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices.
    Colman MW; Zavras AG; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Butler AJ; Singh K; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Oct; 37(4):556-562. PubMed ID: 35426820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does disc distraction after cervical total disc arthroplasty impact range of motion and patient-reported outcomes?
    Federico VP; Zavras AG; Nie JW; Butler AJ; Munim MA; Nolte MT; Lopez GD; An HS; Colman MW; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):335-344. PubMed ID: 37310033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
    Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.
    Ma Y; Yu X; Li C; Xiong Y; Zhao H; Yang Y; Zhao D; Wang F; Qu Y; Yang J; Bi L; Yue X
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Mar; 33(3):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 38015272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.
    Ahn PG; Kim KN; Moon SW; Kim KS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zavras AG; Dandu N; Nolte MT; Butler AJ; Federico VP; Sayari AJ; Sullivan TB; Colman MW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Oct; 37(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 35453108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.
    Mo Z; Li Q; Jia Z; Yang J; Wong DW; Fan Y
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1181-1190. PubMed ID: 27652678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
    Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation.
    Wuertinger C; Annes RDÀ; Hitzl W; Siepe CJ
    Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28673830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].
    Lou J; Liu H; Rong X; Gong Q; Song Y; Li T
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26455172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
    Rabin D; Bertagnoli R; Wharton N; Pickett GE; Duggal N
    Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative Efficacy of Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty Devices and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Pathology: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zavras AG; Federico VP; Butler AJ; Nolte MT; Dandu N; Phillips FM; Colman MW
    Global Spine J; 2024 Jan; 14(1):322-346. PubMed ID: 37099726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
    Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].
    Xu S; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Liu H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 30983184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-Ray-based Kinematic Analysis of Cervical Spine According to Prosthesis Designs: Analysis of the Mobi C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LP.
    Park SB; Kim KJ; Jin YJ; Kim HJ; Jahng TA; Chung CK
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jun; 28(5):E291-7. PubMed ID: 23429318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
    Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?
    Voronov LI; Havey RM; Tsitsopoulos PP; Khayatzadeh S; Goodsitt J; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Apr; 12(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30276086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The factors that influence the postoperative segmental range of motion after cervical artificial disc replacement.
    Kang KC; Lee CS; Han JH; Chung SS
    Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):689-96. PubMed ID: 20547108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of prosthesis design on segmental biomechanics: semi-constrained versus unconstrained prostheses and anterior versus posterior centre of rotation.
    Wilke HJ; Schmidt R; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Reichel H; Cakir B
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S577-84. PubMed ID: 20830492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.