These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression. Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of preoperative segmental range of motion on patient outcomes in cervical disc arthroplasty. Wu TK; Liu H; Ding C; Rong X; He JB; Huang KK; Hong Y; Wang BY BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):457. PubMed ID: 32660463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effects of preoperative segmental mobility on the clinical and radiographic outcomes following one-level artificial cervical disc replacement]. Wu TK; Liu H; Wang BY; Meng Y; Ding C; Rong X; Chen H; Yang Y; Hong Y; Huang KK; He JB Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3596-3601. PubMed ID: 33333683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Best NM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Kim SW; Limson MA; Kim SB; Arbatin JJ; Chang KY; Park MS; Shin JH; Ju YS Eur Spine J; 2009 Feb; 18(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 19127374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Zhao J; Jiang R; Yang Y; Gu R; Gao Z; Xiao J; Chen S; Yang M Med Sci Monit; 2017 Dec; 23():5844-5850. PubMed ID: 29222937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ProDisc-C: an in vivo kinematic study. Duggal N; Bertagnoli R; Rabin D; Wharton N; Kowalczyk I J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 21150671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement. A four-year prospective monocentric study]. Barna M; Stulík J; Kryl J; Vyskočil T; Nesnídal P Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 23286683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Kim SW; Shin JH; Arbatin JJ; Park MS; Chung YK; McAfee PC Eur Spine J; 2008 Jan; 17(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17721713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]