These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35428461)

  • 21. [Estimation of the Average Glandular Dose Using the Mammary Gland Image Analysis in Mammography].
    Otsuka T; Teramoto A; Asada Y; Suzuki S; Fujita H; Kamiya S; Anno H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 May; 72(5):389-95. PubMed ID: 27211083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.
    Hendrick RE; Pisano ED; Averbukh A; Moran C; Berns EA; Yaffe MJ; Herman B; Acharyya S; Gatsonis C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 20093597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of average glandular dose (AGD) in screening and diagnostic digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) towards establishing a reference dose range band (DRB): a developing country experience.
    Jeyasugiththan J; Maheshika Bandara BGU; Wickramarathna SHD; Thenuwara H; Satharasinghe D; Pallewatte AS; Hettiarachchi P
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jul; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37463573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast tomosynthesis: state of the art.
    Rocha García AM; Mera Fernández D
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(4):274-285. PubMed ID: 30808510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.
    Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah SA
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):185-192. PubMed ID: 32495513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Replacing single-view mediolateral oblique (MLO) digital mammography (DM) with synthesized mammography (SM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images: Comparison of the diagnostic performance and radiation dose with two-view DM with or without MLO-DBT.
    Kang HJ; Chang JM; Lee J; Song SE; Shin SU; Kim WH; Bae MS; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2042-2048. PubMed ID: 27776658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Fusco R; Raiano N; Raiano C; Maio F; Vallone P; Mattace Raso M; Setola SV; Granata V; Rubulotta MR; Barretta ML; Petrosino T; Petrillo A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108912. PubMed ID: 32151787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran.
    Asadollahzadeh N; Razavi S; Zare MH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(9):809-821. PubMed ID: 38811346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N; Sechopoulos I; Mattsson S
    Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25554018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does the use of self-compression in mammography affect compression force, breast thickness, and mean glandular dose?
    Alukic E; Bravhar P; Mekis N
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109694. PubMed ID: 33839429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PARAMETERS OF THE THYROID GLAND IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT BREAST TUMORS, WHO SUFFERED FROM THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT.
    Basyka DA; Lytvynenko OO; Bugaicov SG; Shakhrai GF; Daniluk II
    Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2019 Dec; 24():312-321. PubMed ID: 31841476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audit of data from examination image headers collected for quality assurance in the ECOG-ACRIN EA1151 tomosynthesis mammographic imaging screening trial (TMIST).
    Maki AK; Mawdsley GE; Mainprize JG; Pisano E; Shen SZ; Alonzo-Proulx O; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7427-7440. PubMed ID: 37824821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cepeda Martins AR; Di Maria S; Afonso J; Pereira M; Pereira J; Vaz P
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 34565679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the population dose to the UK population from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme.
    Faulkner K; Wallis MG; Neilson F; Whitaker CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):184-90. PubMed ID: 18483008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.