BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35428558)

  • 1. Assessment of soft-tissue vs hard-tissue changes after isolated functional genioplasty.
    Chamberland S; Nataf N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):e554-e570. PubMed ID: 35428558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of soft-tissue vs hard-tissue changes after isolated functional genioplasty].
    Chamberland S; Nataf N
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):213-233. PubMed ID: 36217582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.
    Park JY; Kim MJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 23395297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft-Tissue Response following Genioplasty Combined with Anterior Segmental Osteotomy.
    Kim HY; Han SB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jan; 153(1):54e-63e. PubMed ID: 37036313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Functional genioplasty in growing patients].
    Chamberland S; Proffit WR; Chamberland PE
    Orthod Fr; 2016 Jun; 87(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 27358003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review on soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery part II: Chin procedures.
    San Miguel Moragas J; Oth O; Büttner M; Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1530-40. PubMed ID: 26321067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty: a systematic review.
    George JA; Kannan A; Kailasam V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 34383152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional genioplasty in growing patients.
    Chamberland S; Proffit WR; Chamberland PE
    Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):360-73. PubMed ID: 25078974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hard and soft tissue changes and long-term stability after vertical height reduction genioplasty using biodegradable fixation.
    Park JH; Jung HD; Cha JY; Jung YS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 48(8):1051-1056. PubMed ID: 30773332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Osseous Genioplasty: Prevention of Witch's Chin Deformity with No-Degloving Technique.
    Zhang BH; Byrd R; Bradley C; Volpicelli EJ; Gibstein AR; Fisher M; Lee JC; Bradley JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):720e-726e. PubMed ID: 34529592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
    Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term hard and soft tissue relapse rate after genioplasty.
    Talebzadeh N; Pogrel MA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 11174590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Achieved chin position after genioplasty follows the planned horizontal change better than the planned vertical change.
    Agbaje JO; Sun Y; Salem AS; Li Z; Adu KO; Politis C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1287-1292. PubMed ID: 28684075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement and genioplasty.
    Ewing M; Ross RB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jun; 101(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 1598895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue response after chin advancement using two different genioplasty techniques: a preliminary technical comparative study.
    Seifeldin SA; Shawky M; Hicham Nouman SM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1383-8. PubMed ID: 24926726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hard and Soft Tissue Relapse After Different Genioplasty Procedures: A Scoping Review.
    Kumar M; Singh RS; Singh G; Raj P; Gupta H; Kasrija R
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41478. PubMed ID: 37551245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study.
    Kumar BL; Raju GK; Kumar ND; Reddy GV; Naik BR; Achary CR
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Apr; 7(4):44-50. PubMed ID: 25954070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of chin profile after mandibular setback and reduction genioplasty for correction of prognathism and long chin.
    Ho CT; Huang CS; Lo LJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1198-206. PubMed ID: 22692788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective study of soft- and hard-tissue changes after mandibular advancement surgery: Midline changes in the chin area.
    Bral A; Olate S; Zaror C; Mensink G; Coscia G; Mommaerts MY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 May; 157(5):662-667. PubMed ID: 32354439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone healing and stability after advancement genioplasty using a pre-bent absorbable plate and screws.
    Ueki K; Takayama A; Gomi K; Takekawa T; Ono S; Moroi A; Yoshizawa K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 51(9):536-542. PubMed ID: 37573222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.