BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35428621)

  • 1. Individualised non-contrast MRI-based risk estimation and shared decision-making in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer: protocol for multicentre randomised controlled trial (multi-IMPROD V.2.0).
    Ettala O; Jambor I; Montoya Perez I; Seppänen M; Kaipia A; Seikkula H; Syvänen KT; Taimen P; Verho J; Steiner A; Saunavaara J; Saukko E; Löyttyniemi E; Sjoberg DD; Vickers A; Aronen H; Boström P
    BMJ Open; 2022 Apr; 12(4):e053118. PubMed ID: 35428621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol.
    Asif A; Nathan A; Ng A; Khetrapal P; Chan VW; Giganti F; Allen C; Freeman A; Punwani S; Lorgelly P; Clarke CS; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Emberton M; Agarwal R; Takwoingi Y; Deeks JJ; Moore CM; Kasivisvanathan V;
    BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e070280. PubMed ID: 37019486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior randomised controlled trial on a novel three-dimensional matrix positioning-based cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy and software-based fusion-targeted biopsy for the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in men without a prior biopsy.
    He B; Li R; Li D; Huang L; Wen X; Yang G; Wang H
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e041427. PubMed ID: 33550242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
    Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a novel diagnostic pathway including blood-based risk prediction and MRI-targeted biopsies outperform prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen and systematic prostate biopsies? - protocol of the randomised study STHLM3MRI.
    Nordström T; Jäderling F; Carlsson S; Aly M; Grönberg H; Eklund M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027816. PubMed ID: 31201191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of ISUP ≥2 prostate cancers using multiparametric MRI: prospective multicentre assessment of the non-inferiority of an artificial intelligence system as compared to the PI-RADS V.2.1 score (CHANGE study).
    Rouvière O; Souchon R; Lartizien C; Mansuy A; Magaud L; Colom M; Dubreuil-Chambardel M; Debeer S; Jaouen T; Duran A; Rippert P; Riche B; Monini C; Vlaeminck-Guillem V; Haesebaert J; Rabilloud M; Crouzet S
    BMJ Open; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e051274. PubMed ID: 35140147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing whether MRI-targeted biopsy is non-inferior to standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in men without prior biopsy: a study protocol.
    Kasivisvanathan V; Jichi F; Klotz L; Villers A; Taneja SS; Punwani S; Freeman A; Emberton M; Moore CM
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017863. PubMed ID: 29025845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Additive Diagnostic Value of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Triage in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): A Prospective Multicentre Study.
    Emmett L; Buteau J; Papa N; Moon D; Thompson J; Roberts MJ; Rasiah K; Pattison DA; Yaxley J; Thomas P; Hutton AC; Agrawal S; Amin A; Blazevski A; Chalasani V; Ho B; Nguyen A; Liu V; Lee J; Sheehan-Dare G; Kooner R; Coughlin G; Chan L; Cusick T; Namdarian B; Kapoor J; Alghazo O; Woo HH; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy D; Hofman MS; Stricker P
    Eur Urol; 2021 Dec; 80(6):682-689. PubMed ID: 34465492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of prostate cancer for men with prior negative biopsies undergoing magnetic resonance imaging compared with biopsy-naive men: A prospective evaluation of the PLUM cohort.
    Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Bhanji Y; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Gupta GN
    Cancer; 2022 Jan; 128(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 34427930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PCASTt/SPCG-17-a randomised trial of active surveillance in prostate cancer: rationale and design.
    Ahlberg MS; Adami HO; Beckmann K; Bertilsson H; Bratt O; Cahill D; Egevad L; Garmo H; Holmberg L; Johansson E; Rannikko A; Van Hemelrijck M; Jäderling F; Wassberg C; Åberg UWN; Bill-Axelson A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e027860. PubMed ID: 31444180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
    Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A protocol for the VISION study: An indiVidual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing MRI-targeted biopsy to standard transrectal ultraSound guided bIopsy in the detection of prOstate cancer.
    Kasivisvanathan V; Chan VW; Clement KD; Levis B; Haider M; Agarwal R; Emberton M; Pond GR; Takwoingi Y; Klotz L; Moore CM;
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263345. PubMed ID: 35113918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsies needed in men with serum prostate-specific antigen over 10 ng/ml and an abnormal digital rectal examination?
    Morote J; Picola N; Paesano N; Celma A; Muñoz-Rodriguez J; Asiain I; Ruiz-Plazas X; Muñoz-Rivero MV; de Manuel GG; Servian P; Abascal JM
    Urol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 41(7):299-301. PubMed ID: 37244767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
    Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Danish Prostate Cancer Consortium Study 1 (DPCC-1) protocol: Multicentre prospective validation of the urine-based three-microRNA biomarker model uCaP.
    Fredsøe J; Glud E; Boesen L; Løgager V; Poulsen MH; Pedersen BG; Borre M; Sørensen KD
    BMJ Open; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e077020. PubMed ID: 37940151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.