162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35430635)
1. Comparison of outcomes with low-power long duration versus high-power short duration of ablation: the role of the acute change in sinus rhythm after the ablation as a predictor of long-term success.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Cunha C; Serpa E; Simoes A; Lovatto C; Gasparini D; Corcino L; Schmidt A
Heart Vessels; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1749-1756. PubMed ID: 35430635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced esophageal heating in high-power short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation in the contact force catheter era.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Serpa E; Cunha CL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Amaral D; Lovatto C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Jul; 44(7):1185-1192. PubMed ID: 34081339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher power short duration vs. lower power longer duration posterior wall ablation for atrial fibrillation and oesophageal injury outcomes: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled study (Hi-Lo HEAT trial).
Chieng D; Segan L; Sugumar H; Al-Kaisey A; Hawson J; Moore BM; Nam MCY; Voskoboinik A; Prabhu S; Ling LH; Ng JF; Brown G; Lee G; Morton J; Debinski H; Kalman JM; Kistler PM
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):417-424. PubMed ID: 36305561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.
Hansom SP; Alqarawi W; Birnie DH; Golian M; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Klein A; Green MS; Davis DR; Sheppard-Perkins E; Ramirez FD; Nair GM; Sadek MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 33751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes and impacts in early recurrences after atrial fibrillation ablation in contact force era: comparison of high-power short-duration with conventional technique-FIRST experience data.
Vassallo F; Meigre LL; Serpa E; Cunha C; Simoes A; Carloni H; Amaral D; Meira K; Pezzin F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Nov; 62(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 33151444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute oesophageal safety and long-term follow-up of AI-guided high-power short-duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Zhuravlev V; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Halbfass P; Deneke T
Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1379-1391. PubMed ID: 36881791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation guided by the ablation index.
Sousa PA; Puga L; Barra S; Adão L; Primo J; Khoueiry Z; Lebreiro A; Fonseca P; Pereira M; Lagrange P; d'Avila A; Oliveiros B; Elvas L; Gonçalves L
Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():209-214. PubMed ID: 36228764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial.
Joza J; Nair GM; Birnie DH; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Sarrazin JF; Champagne J; Bernick J; Wells GA; Essebag V;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 37990448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Dikdan SJ; Junarta J; Bodempudi S; Upadhyay N; Pang Z; Frisch DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 33415782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters: Outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation.
Winkle RA; Mead RH; Engel G; Kong MH; Salcedo J; Brodt CR; Patrawala RA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 32272229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Chen CC; Lee PT; Van Ba V; Chuang CM; Lin YJ; Lo LW; Hu YF; Chung FP; Lin CY; Chang TY; Vicera JJ; Huang TC; Liu CM; Wu CI; Lugtu IC; Jain A; Chang SL; Chen SA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Aug; 21(1):387. PubMed ID: 34372779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes after low power, slower movement versus high power, faster movement irrigated-tip catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Bunch TJ; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Mallender C; Weiss JP; Osborn JS; Day JD
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Feb; 17(2):184-189. PubMed ID: 31398477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison of two 50 W high power short duration approaches-Temperature- versus ablation index-guided radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Guckel D; Bergau L; Braun M; El Hamriti M; Mörsdorf M; Fink T; Sciacca V; Khalaph M; Imnadze G; Sommer P; Sohns C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2517-2527. PubMed ID: 36104929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of high-power short-duration and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for treating atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen CF; Wu J; Jin CL; Liu MJ; Xu YZ
Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1631-1640. PubMed ID: 33107625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of very high-power short-duration, high-power short-duration, and low-power long-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Junarta J; Rodriguez S; Ullah W; Siddiqui MU; Riley JM; Patel A; O'Neill P; Dikdan SJ; Fradin JJ; Rosen JL; Frisch DR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 46(12):1609-1634. PubMed ID: 37971718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.
Junarta J; Dikdan SJ; Upadhyay N; Bodempudi S; Shvili MY; Frisch DR
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 34846561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidental parasympathetic cardiac denervation during atrial fibrillation ablation using high power short duration: a marker of long-term success.
Vassallo F; Corcino L; Cunha C; Serpa E; Lovatto C; Simoes A; Carloni H; Hespanhol D; Gasparini D; Barbosa LF; Schmidt A
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37773556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High power short duration versus low power long duration ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Parlavecchio A; Vetta G; Coluccia G; Pistelli L; Caminiti R; Ajello M; Magnocavallo M; Dattilo G; Foti R; Carerj S; Crea P; Chierchia GB; de Asmundis C; Della Rocca DG; Palmisano P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1430-1439. PubMed ID: 37812165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HPSD ablation for AF high-power short-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation: A review.
Winkle RA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 32(10):2813-2823. PubMed ID: 33382506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: Initial results.
Vassallo F; Cunha C; Serpa E; Meigre LL; Carloni H; Simoes A; Hespanhol D; Lovatto CV; Batista W; Serpa R
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1877-1883. PubMed ID: 31397522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
