334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35430843)
1. Application of machine learning and its improvement technology in modeling of total energy consumption of air conditioning water system.
Zhu Q; Liu M; Liu H; Zhu Y
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(5):4841-4855. PubMed ID: 35430843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and comparative analysis of ANN and SVR-based models with conventional regression models for predicting spray drift.
Moges G; McDonnell K; Delele MA; Ali AN; Fanta SW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(8):21927-21944. PubMed ID: 36280637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forecasting annual natural gas consumption via the application of a novel hybrid model.
Gao F; Shao X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(17):21411-21424. PubMed ID: 33415637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time reservoir operation using data mining techniques.
Bozorg-Haddad O; Aboutalebi M; Ashofteh PS; Loáiciga HA
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Sep; 190(10):594. PubMed ID: 30232560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of irrigation groundwater quality parameters using ANN, LSTM, and MLR models.
Kouadri S; Pande CB; Panneerselvam B; Moharir KN; Elbeltagi A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):21067-21091. PubMed ID: 34748181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of weighted arithmetic water quality index for urban water quality using ensemble machine learning model.
Mohseni U; Pande CB; Chandra Pal S; Alshehri F
Chemosphere; 2024 Mar; 352():141393. PubMed ID: 38325619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Operational parameter prediction of electrocoagulation system in a rural decentralized water treatment plant by interpretable machine learning model.
Li B; Lu C; Zhao J; Tian J; Sun J; Hu C
J Environ Manage; 2023 May; 333():117416. PubMed ID: 36758403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction model and application of machine learning for supersaturated total dissolved gas generation in high dam discharge.
Wang Z; Feng J; Liang M; Wu Z; Li R; Chen Z; Liang R
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118682. PubMed ID: 35661511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cefixime removal via WO
Sheikhmohammadi A; Alamgholiloo H; Golaki M; Khakzad P; Asgari E; Rahimlu F
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13840. PubMed ID: 38879660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Least square support vector machine-based variational mode decomposition: a new hybrid model for daily river water temperature modeling.
Heddam S; Ptak M; Sojka M; Kim S; Malik A; Kisi O; Zounemat-Kermani M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(47):71555-71582. PubMed ID: 35604598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Performance of a Stratified Thermal Energy Storage Tank at a District Cooling Plant Using Sensor Data.
Soomro AA; Mokhtar AA; Salilew WM; Abdul Karim ZA; Abbasi A; Lashari N; Jameel SM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting river dissolved oxygen time series based on stand-alone models and hybrid wavelet-based models.
Xu C; Chen X; Zhang L
J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 295():113085. PubMed ID: 34147993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.
Woldaregay AZ; Årsand E; Walderhaug S; Albers D; Mamykina L; Botsis T; Hartvigsen G
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():109-134. PubMed ID: 31383477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of classical and novel integrated machine learning models to predict sediment discharge during free-flow flushing.
Javadi F; Qaderi K; Ahmadi MM; Rahimpour M; Madadi MR; Mahdavi-Meymand A
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19390. PubMed ID: 36371476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of ANN and SVM for prediction nutrients in rivers.
Stamenković LJ
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2021; 56(8):867-873. PubMed ID: 34061713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A predictive model of recreational water quality based on adaptive synthetic sampling algorithms and machine learning.
Xu T; Coco G; Neale M
Water Res; 2020 Jun; 177():115788. PubMed ID: 32330740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lake water-level fluctuation forecasting using machine learning models: a systematic review.
Zhu S; Lu H; Ptak M; Dai J; Ji Q
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(36):44807-44819. PubMed ID: 32978734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photovoltaic Power Generation Forecasting Using a Novel Hybrid Intelligent Model in Smart Grid.
Boum AT; Foba Kakeu VJ; Mbey CF; Yem Souhe FG
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():7495548. PubMed ID: 36248947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elucidating the effect of process parameters on the production of hydrogen-rich syngas by biomass and coal Co-gasification techniques: A multi-criteria modeling approach.
Bahadar A; Kanthasamy R; Sait HH; Zwawi M; Algarni M; Ayodele BV; Cheng CK; Wei LJ
Chemosphere; 2022 Jan; 287(Pt 1):132052. PubMed ID: 34478965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
