These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35431377)

  • 1. Null-free False Discovery Rate Control Using Decoy Permutations.
    He K; Li MJ; Fu Y; Gong FZ; Sun XM
    Acta Math Appl Sin; 2022; 38(2):235-253. PubMed ID: 35431377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Local false discovery rate estimation with competition-based procedures for variable selection.
    Sun X; Fu Y
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):61-88. PubMed ID: 37927105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
    Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling Lower-Order Statistics to Enable Decoy-Free FDR Estimation in Proteomics.
    Madej D; Lam H
    J Proteome Res; 2023 Apr; 22(4):1159-1171. PubMed ID: 36962508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computationally efficient permutation-based confidence interval estimation for tail-area FDR.
    Millstein J; Volfson D
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():179. PubMed ID: 24062767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al.
    Etourneau L; Burger T
    J Proteome Res; 2022 Dec; 21(12):2840-2845. PubMed ID: 36305797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decoy-free protein-level false discovery rate estimation.
    Teng B; Huang T; He Z
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):675-81. PubMed ID: 23926225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
    Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
    Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group-walk: a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition.
    Freestone J; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(Suppl_2):ii82-ii88. PubMed ID: 36124786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Permutation tests for hypothesis testing with animal social network data: Problems and potential solutions.
    Farine DR; Carter GG
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2022 Jan; 13(1):144-156. PubMed ID: 35873757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.
    Peng Y; Jain S; Li YF; Greguš M; Ivanov AR; Vitek O; Radivojac P
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 36(Suppl_2):i745-i753. PubMed ID: 33381824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unveiling the Links Between Peptide Identification and Differential Analysis FDR Controls by Means of a Practical Introduction to Knockoff Filters.
    Etourneau L; Varoquaux N; Burger T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2426():1-24. PubMed ID: 36308682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False discovery rate-controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff-based approach.
    Dai R; Zheng C
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3497-3509. PubMed ID: 36854821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced Permutation Tests via Multiple Pruning.
    Leem S; Huh I; Park T
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():509. PubMed ID: 32670346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition-based control of the false discovery proportion.
    Luo D; Ebadi A; Emery K; He Y; Noble WS; Keich U
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3472-3484. PubMed ID: 36652258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bridging the False Discovery Gap.
    Ebadi A; Freestone J; Noble WS; Keich U
    J Proteome Res; 2023 Jul; 22(7):2172-2178. PubMed ID: 37261867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.