207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35433574)
21. First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wang L; Peng Y; Qin S; Wan X; Zeng X; Li S; Liu Q; Tan C
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0279786. PubMed ID: 37053300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chiang CL; Chan SK; Lee SF; Wong IO; Choi HC
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033761. PubMed ID: 33464318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E; Aguiar PN; Cordón ML; Chavarri-Guerra Y; Lopes GL
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jun; 17(6):669-675. PubMed ID: 31200357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus an Anti-VEGF Antibody as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Li L; Yang S; Chen Y; Tian L; He Y; Wu B; Dong D
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():891008. PubMed ID: 35721168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Zheng Z; Lin Y; Cai H
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1356244. PubMed ID: 38562257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Leung HW; Liu CF; Chan AL
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():69. PubMed ID: 27193904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhu H
Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1103055. PubMed ID: 36713376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding transarterial chemoembolisation to lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
Li W; Wan L
BMJ Open; 2023 Sep; 13(9):e074245. PubMed ID: 37751954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Egypt.
Hamdy Elsisi G; Nada Y; Rashad N; Carapinha J
J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 30479174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Marqueen KE; Kim E; Ang C; Mazumdar M; Buckstein M; Ferket BS
JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e266-e277. PubMed ID: 33417490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib as second-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany and the United States.
Sieg M; Hartmann M; Settmacher U; Arefian H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 20(1):120. PubMed ID: 32316925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus IBI305 versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatic cell carcinoma in China.
Xu Z; Ye ZM; Tang YK; Deng DF; Zhou Q; Fang M; Zhang YY; Li XP
Cancer Med; 2023 Jul; 12(14):14871-14880. PubMed ID: 37434398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhao RC; Zhou J; Wei YG; Liu F; Chen KF; Li Q; Li B
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2017 Oct; 16(5):493-498. PubMed ID: 28992881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cai H; Zhang L; Li N; Zheng B; Liu M
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jun; 9(8):553-562. PubMed ID: 32419473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Economic evaluation of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States and China.
Wei J; Xu K; Lin Y; Liu Q; Zhou C; Zhang P; Ma R; Zhang M; Zhang L; Li X
Int J Clin Pharm; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38814514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Kim JJ; McFarlane T; Tully S; Wong WWL
Oncologist; 2020 Mar; 25(3):e512-e519. PubMed ID: 32162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-Effectiveness of Sorafenib Monotherapy and Selected Combination Therapy with Sorafenib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Ho JC; Hsieh ML; Chuang PH; Hsieh VC
Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 May; 15():120-126. PubMed ID: 29704658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of FOLFOX Combined Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion.
Li M; Lin S; Wilson L; Huang P; Wang H; Lai S; Dong L; Xu X; Weng X
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():562135. PubMed ID: 33767976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Regorafenib treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib-A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Shlomai A; Leshno M; Goldstein DA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207132. PubMed ID: 30408106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
