These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35434639)

  • 1. The structural shift and collaboration capacity in GenBank Networks: A longitudinal study.
    Qin J; Hemsley J; Bratt SE
    Quant Sci Stud; 2022; 3(1):174-193. PubMed ID: 35434639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collaboration Networks and Career Trajectories: What Do Metadata from Data Repositories Tell Us?
    Jeff H; Jian Q; Sarah B; Alexander S
    Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol; 2022; 59(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 37692532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns.
    Pepe A; Rodriguez MA
    Scientometrics; 2010 Sep; 84(3):687-701. PubMed ID: 20700373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social network analysis of biomedical research collaboration networks in a CTSA institution.
    Bian J; Xie M; Topaloglu U; Hudson T; Eswaran H; Hogan W
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():130-40. PubMed ID: 24560679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic metadata harvesting workflow for analysing scientific networks.
    Butt BH; Rafi M; Sabih M
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e421. PubMed ID: 33817056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards Structuring Unstructured GenBank Metadata for Enhancing Comparative Biological Studies.
    Chen ES; Sarkar IN
    AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2011; 2011():6-10. PubMed ID: 22211174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of production, impact, and collaboration networks in scientific research in Scopus for Peru from 2000 to 2019].
    Mendoza-Chuctaya G; Chachaima-Mar JE; Mejia CR; Mirano-Ortiz-de-Orue MG; Ramos KR; Calla-Torres M; De-Los-Ríos-Pinto A; Ccorahua-Rios MS; Santander-Cahuantico AC; Centeno-Araujo A; Miranda-Solis F; Huaraca Paricahua R
    Medwave; 2021 Mar; 21(2):e8121. PubMed ID: 33830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Networks of Collaboration among Scientists in a Center for Diabetes Translation Research.
    Harris JK; Wong R; Thompson K; Haire-Joshu D; Hipp JA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136457. PubMed ID: 26301873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tie strength distribution in scientific collaboration networks.
    Ke Q; Ahn YY
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(3):032804. PubMed ID: 25314479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaboration on evidence synthesis in Africa: a network study of growing research capacity.
    Pan J; Zhong Y; Young S; Niezink NMD
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2021 Sep; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 34538255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forging a link between mentoring and collaboration: a new training model for implementation science.
    Luke DA; Baumann AA; Carothers BJ; Landsverk J; Proctor EK
    Implement Sci; 2016 Oct; 11(1):137. PubMed ID: 27737693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal trends in global obesity research and collaboration: a review using bibliometric metadata.
    Khan A; Choudhury N; Uddin S; Hossain L; Baur LA
    Obes Rev; 2016 Apr; 17(4):377-85. PubMed ID: 26864566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific collaboration dynamics in a national scientific system.
    Ferligoj A; Kronegger L; Mali F; Snijders TA; Doreian P
    Scientometrics; 2015; 104(3):985-1012. PubMed ID: 27829692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks.
    Fares J; Chung KSK; Abbasi A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0255658. PubMed ID: 34648505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collaboration networks from a large CV database: dynamics, topology and bonus impact.
    Araújo EB; Moreira AA; Furtado V; Pequeno TH; Andrade JS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90537. PubMed ID: 24603470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GenBank and PubMed: How connected are they?
    Miller H; Norton CN; Sarkar IN
    BMC Res Notes; 2009 Jun; 2():101. PubMed ID: 19508734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mapping longitudinal scientific progress, collaboration and impact of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative.
    Yao X; Yan J; Ginda M; Börner K; Saykin AJ; Shen L;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0186095. PubMed ID: 29095836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visualizing and evaluating the growth of multi-institutional collaboration based on research network analysis.
    Luo J; Pelfrey C; Zhang GQ
    AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2014; 2014():60-6. PubMed ID: 25954579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health policy and systems research collaboration pathways: lessons from a network science analysis.
    English KM; Pourbohloul B
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Aug; 15(1):71. PubMed ID: 28844208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breaking down silos: mapping growth of cross-disciplinary collaboration in a translational science initiative.
    Luke DA; Carothers BJ; Dhand A; Bell RA; Moreland-Russell S; Sarli CC; Evanoff BA
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Apr; 8(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 25472908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.