These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35435773)

  • 1. Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Tawdrous MM; D'Onofrio KL; Gifford R; Picou EM
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221083091. PubMed ID: 35435773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of unilateral input and mode of hearing in the better ear: self-reported performance using the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale.
    Dwyer NY; Firszt JB; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 24084062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of (Mis)Matched Compression Speed on Speech Recognition in Bimodal Listeners.
    Spirrov D; Kludt E; Verschueren E; Büchner A; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948974. PubMed ID: 32865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Reeder RM; Cowdrey L; King S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 22441359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
    Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Increasing the Overall Level or Fitting Hearing Aids on Emotional Responses to Sounds.
    Picou EM; Rakita L; Buono GH; Moore TM
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211049938. PubMed ID: 34866509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison between a remote testing and a laboratory test setting for evaluating emotional responses to non-speech sounds.
    Picou EM; Singh G; Russo FA
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):799-808. PubMed ID: 34883031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are There Real-world Benefits to Bimodal Listening?
    Nyirjesy S; Rodman C; Tamati TN; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Oct; 41(9):e1111-e1117. PubMed ID: 32925846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loss of high- or low-frequency audibility can partially explain effects of hearing loss on emotional responses to non-speech sounds.
    Buono GH; Crukley J; Hornsby BWY; Picou EM
    Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 401():108153. PubMed ID: 33360158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
    Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Langerak NC; Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 38447538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Runge CL; Jensen J; Friedland DR; Litovsky RY; Tarima S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):567-577. PubMed ID: 22192602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Digeser F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 138(8):713-721. PubMed ID: 29553839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.