BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35436614)

  • 41. Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(5):1387-401. PubMed ID: 15369521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cortical Tracking of Speech-in-Noise Develops from Childhood to Adulthood.
    Vander Ghinst M; Bourguignon M; Niesen M; Wens V; Hassid S; Choufani G; Jousmäki V; Hari R; Goldman S; De Tiège X
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(15):2938-2950. PubMed ID: 30745419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Audiovisual synchrony detection for fluent speech in early childhood: An eye-tracking study.
    Zhou HY; Yang HX; Wei Z; Wan GB; Lui SSY; Chan RCK
    Psych J; 2022 Jun; 11(3):409-418. PubMed ID: 35350086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ERP evidence that auditory-visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults.
    Frtusova JB; Winneke AH; Phillips NA
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Jun; 28(2):481-94. PubMed ID: 23421321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does audiovisual speech offer a fountain of youth for old ears? An event-related brain potential study of age differences in audiovisual speech perception.
    Winneke AH; Phillips NA
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 21443357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Culture and listeners' gaze responses to stuttering.
    Zhang J; Kalinowski J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 22788225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Read my lips! Perception of speech in noise by preschool children with autism and the impact of watching the speaker's face.
    Newman RS; Kirby LA; Von Holzen K; Redcay E
    J Neurodev Disord; 2021 Jan; 13(1):4. PubMed ID: 33402099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Segmenting Speech by Mouth: The Role of Oral Prosodic Cues for Visual Speech Segmentation.
    Mitchel AD; Lusk LG; Wellington I; Mook AT
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):819-832. PubMed ID: 36448317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selective attention to the mouth of talking faces in monolinguals and bilinguals aged 5 months to 5 years.
    Morin-Lessard E; Poulin-Dubois D; Segalowitz N; Byers-Heinlein K
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Aug; 55(8):1640-1655. PubMed ID: 31169400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of Age and Uncertainty on the Visual Speech Benefit in Noise.
    Beadle J; Kim J; Davis C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):5041-5060. PubMed ID: 34762813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.
    Bidelman GM; Brown B; Mankel K; Nelms Price C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):268-277. PubMed ID: 31283529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Simulation of talking faces in the human brain improves auditory speech recognition.
    von Kriegstein K; Dogan O; Grüter M; Giraud AL; Kell CA; Grüter T; Kleinschmidt A; Kiebel SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 May; 105(18):6747-52. PubMed ID: 18436648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mouth and Voice: A Relationship between Visual and Auditory Preference in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 28179553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Watching talking faces: The development of cortical representation of visual syllables in infancy.
    Dopierała AAW; López Pérez D; Mercure E; Pluta A; Malinowska-Korczak A; Evans S; Wolak T; Tomalski P
    Brain Lang; 2023 Sep; 244():105304. PubMed ID: 37481794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Audiovisual alignment of co-speech gestures to speech supports word learning in 2-year-olds.
    Jesse A; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 May; 145():1-10. PubMed ID: 26765249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Degrading phonetic information affects matching of audiovisual speech in adults, but not in infants.
    Baart M; Vroomen J; Shaw K; Bortfeld H
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 24141035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lip movements affect infants' audiovisual speech perception.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 23538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Audio-tactile enhancement of cortical speech-envelope tracking.
    Riecke L; Snipes S; van Bree S; Kaas A; Hausfeld L
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116134. PubMed ID: 31470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
    Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.