BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35437194)

  • 1. How effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?
    Esen A; Menziletoglu D; Aybüke Erdur E; Akkulah S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 60(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 35437194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
    Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
    Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
    Demircan S; Uretürk EU; Apaydın A; Şen S
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.
    He Y; Zhang H; Qiao J; Fu X; Xu S; Jin Q; Liu J; Chen Y; Yu B; Niu F
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():891747. PubMed ID: 35599806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
    De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution and transverse displacement of novel designs of miniplates for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: a finite element analysis.
    Anlar H; Hasanoglu Erbasar GN; Konarılı FN; Orhan M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 60(9):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 36055864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of bicortical, miniplate and hybrid fixation techniques in mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation: A finite element analysis study.
    Can S; Basa S; Varol A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):e7-e14. PubMed ID: 33848666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
    Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
    Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does adjunctive fixation in conjunction with miniplate affect condylar position and morphology after mandibular advancement through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy? A retrospective 3-dimensional CT comparative study.
    Al-Watary MQ; Telha WA; Ge H; Wu Y; Sun X; Qing Z; Li J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 52(6):778-785. PubMed ID: 38627189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Caldas RA; Goulart DR; Hemerson de Moraes P; Olate S; Ricardo Barão VA; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 30718216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
    Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.