These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35437194)

  • 41. Biomechanical evaluation of a T-shaped miniplate fixation of a modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy with buccal step, a new technique for mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Aymach Z; Nei H; Kawamura H; Bell W
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 20580286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Different Lingual Split Patterns and Advancement Amounts Using the Finite Element Method.
    Dai Z; Hou M; Ma W; Song DL; Zhang CX; Zhou WY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2286.e1-2286.e11. PubMed ID: 27542550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Modified hybrid fixation using absorbable plate and screw for mandibular advancement surgery.
    Ueki K; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Fukaya K; Hiraide R; Takayama A; Tsunoda T; Saito Y; Baba N; Sato M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1788-1793. PubMed ID: 28927955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement.
    Hara S; Mitsugi M; Tatemoto Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
    Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis.
    Ergezen Ozasir E; Tosun E; Tuz HH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):652-657. PubMed ID: 32068168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    da Silva Oliveira S; de Carvalho PHM; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):633-639. PubMed ID: 35022847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The relationship between fixation method and early central condylar sagging after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in orthognathic surgery.
    Berköz Ö; Karaali S; Kozanoğlu E; Akalın BE; Çeri A; Barış Ş; Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 48(10):928-932. PubMed ID: 32873467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Which kind of miniplate to use in mandibular sagittal split osteotomy? An in vitro study.
    Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 22658672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stability of the miniplate osteosynthesis used for sagittal split osteotomy for closing an anterior open bite: an experimental study in mini-pigs.
    Nieblerová J; Foltán R; Hanzelka T; Pavlíková G; Vlk M; Klíma K; Samsonyan L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 41(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 22154574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.
    Olivera LB; Sant' Ana E; Manzato AJ; Guerra FL; Arnett GW
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 23032203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
    Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Biomechanical analysis in mandibular advancement and occlusal plane rotation with finite element analysis.
    da Silveira MLM; de Oliveira Bueno ML; da Silva JSP; Germano AR
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Apr; 59(3):362-367. PubMed ID: 33358030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Resistance and Stress Finite Element Analysis of Different Types of Fixation for Mandibular Orthognathic Surgery.
    Stringhini DJ; Sommerfeld R; Uetanabaro LC; Leonardi DP; Araújo MR; Rebellato NL; Costa DJ; Scariot R
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 27224561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.
    Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Modification of the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: mobilizing vertical osteotomy of the internal ramus segment.
    Ricard D; Ferri J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1691-9. PubMed ID: 19615584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.