These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35437217)

  • 1. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
    Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
    Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
    Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
    Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study (ASIST): Results of a Randomized Multicenter Prospective Trial.
    Klotz L; Loblaw A; Sugar L; Moussa M; Berman DM; Van der Kwast T; Vesprini D; Milot L; Kebabdjian M; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Chin J; Pond GR; Haider M
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):300-309. PubMed ID: 30017404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
    Chu CE; Cowan JE; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Fasulo V; de la Calle CM; Shinohara K; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):537-543. PubMed ID: 33483265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nine-year Follow-up for a Study of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Prospective Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
    Henderson DR; de Souza NM; Thomas K; Riches SF; Morgan VA; Sohaib SA; Dearnaley DP; Parker CC; van As NJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1028-33. PubMed ID: 26482887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
    Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional Cohort.
    Shee K; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Shinohara K; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Aug; 7(4):838-843. PubMed ID: 38057193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
    Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
    Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
    Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upgrading on Per Protocol versus For Cause surveillance prostate biopsies: An opportunity to decreasing the burden of active surveillance.
    Wang M; Lange A; Perlman D; Qi J; George AK; Ferrante S; Semerjian A; Sarle R; Cher ML; Ginsburg KB;
    Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(12):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 37173808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized Study of Systematic Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted and Systematic Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance (ASIST): 2-year Postbiopsy Follow-up.
    Klotz L; Pond G; Loblaw A; Sugar L; Moussa M; Berman D; Van der Kwast T; Vesprini D; Milot L; Kebabdjian M; Fleshner N; Ghai S; Chin J; Haider M
    Eur Urol; 2020 Mar; 77(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 31708295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should inclusion criteria for active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer be more stringent? From an interim analysis of PRIAS-JAPAN.
    Sugimoto M; Hirama H; Yamaguchi A; Koga H; Hashine K; Ninomiya I; Shinohara N; Maruyama S; Egawa S; Sasaki H; Kakehi Y;
    World J Urol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):981-7. PubMed ID: 25428792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Clinical Stage in Evaluation of Disease Progression for Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
    Chesnut GT; Vertosick EA; Benfante N; Sjoberg DD; Fainberg J; Lee T; Eastham J; Laudone V; Scardino P; Touijer K; Vickers A; Ehdaie B
    Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):501-507. PubMed ID: 31874726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density.
    Umbehr MH; Platz EA; Peskoe SB; Bhavsar NA; Epstein JI; Landis P; Partin AW; Carter HB
    BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 23746233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing confirmatory biopsy outcomes between MRI-targeted biopsy and standard systematic biopsy among men being enrolled in prostate cancer active surveillance.
    Shapiro DD; Gregg JR; Lim AH; Nogueras-González GM; Choi H; Kang HC; Inguillo IA; Chapin BF; Davis JW; Ward JF
    BJU Int; 2021 Mar; 127(3):340-348. PubMed ID: 32357283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.