BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

560 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35438561)

  • 1. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence (AI) for breast cancer screening: BreastScreen population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Lund H; Waddell A; Madeley C; Pereira G; Houssami N
    EBioMedicine; 2023 Apr; 90():104498. PubMed ID: 36863255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study.
    Dembrower K; Wåhlin E; Liu Y; Salim M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Eklund M; Strand F
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Sep; 2(9):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 33328114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography performance according to breast density: a comparison between radiologists versus standalone intelligence detection.
    Kwon MR; Chang Y; Ham SY; Cho Y; Kim EY; Kang J; Park EK; Kim KH; Kim M; Kim TS; Lee H; Kwon R; Lim GY; Choi HR; Choi J; Kook SH; Ryu S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2024 Apr; 26(1):68. PubMed ID: 38649889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Shoshan Y; Bakalo R; Gilboa-Solomon F; Ratner V; Barkan E; Ozery-Flato M; Amit M; Khapun D; Ambinder EB; Oluyemi ET; Panigrahi B; DiCarlo PA; Rosen-Zvi M; Mullen LA
    Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35040677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
    Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we reduce the workload of mammographic screening by automatic identification of normal exams with artificial intelligence? A feasibility study.
    Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lång K; Gubern-Merida A; Teuwen J; Broeders M; Gennaro G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Chevalier M; Mertelmeier T; Wallis MG; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4825-4832. PubMed ID: 30993432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence in BreastScreen Norway: a retrospective analysis of a cancer-enriched sample including 1254 breast cancer cases.
    Koch HW; Larsen M; Bartsch H; Kurz KD; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3735-3743. PubMed ID: 36917260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Possible strategies for use of artificial intelligence in screen-reading of mammograms, based on retrospective data from 122,969 screening examinations.
    Larsen M; Aglen CF; Hoff SR; Lund-Hanssen H; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8238-8246. PubMed ID: 35704111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
    Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Smith RA; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Monsees BS; Sickles EA; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Onega TL
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 24960110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study.
    Dembrower K; Crippa A; Colón E; Eklund M; Strand F;
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Oct; 5(10):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 37690911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance breast cancer screening: protocol for population-based cohort study of cancer detection.
    Marinovich ML; Wylie E; Lotter W; Pearce A; Carter SM; Lund H; Waddell A; Kim JG; Pereira GF; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Brennan M; Houssami N
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jan; 12(1):e054005. PubMed ID: 34980622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
    Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining the strengths of radiologists and AI for breast cancer screening: a retrospective analysis.
    Leibig C; Brehmer M; Bunk S; Byng D; Pinker K; Umutlu L
    Lancet Digit Health; 2022 Jul; 4(7):e507-e519. PubMed ID: 35750400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence.
    Lång K; Dustler M; Dahlblom V; Åkesson A; Andersson I; Zackrisson S
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1687-1692. PubMed ID: 32876835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.