These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35438572)

  • 1. Online patient literature related to oesophageal surgery: the need for greater readability, accreditation and higher quality.
    Musbahi A; Rao CB; Immanuel A; Hayes N
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Feb; 105(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 35438572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Review of Online Patient Resources to Support Shared Decision Making for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Musbahi A; Ali N; Brown L; Brown S; Viswanath YKS; Etherson K; Gopinath B
    World J Surg; 2021 Sep; 45(9):2719-2733. PubMed ID: 34232356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review of online patient resources to support shared decision making for bariatric surgery.
    Musbahi A; Brown LR; Reddy A; Viswanath YKS; Rao M; Gopinath BR
    Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():34-38. PubMed ID: 31883844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of internet information to aid patient decision making in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.
    Williams A; Cunningham A; Hutchings H; Harris DA; Evans MD; Harji D
    Surgeon; 2022 Dec; 20(6):e382-e391. PubMed ID: 35033455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the quality and readability of online information on keratoconus treatment.
    Panthagani J; Hamze H; Riaz A; Moussa G
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 58(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 34678173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Quality of Printed Online Education Materials in Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.
    Alwani MM; Campiti VJ; Bandali EH; Nesemeier BR; Ting JY; Shipchandler TZ
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2020; 22(4):255-261. PubMed ID: 32267787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to deep vein thrombosis.
    Qadeer MA; Kelly M; Lenehan B
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2022 Jan; 33(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 34799504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Our Patients and Their Families Are Reading: Quality and Readability of Internet Information About Electroconvulsive Therapy.
    Ekinci O
    J ECT; 2023 Dec; 39(4):242-247. PubMed ID: 37310071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diabetes websites accredited by the Health On the Net Foundation Code of Conduct: readable or not?
    Kusec S; Brborovic O; Schillinger D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():655-60. PubMed ID: 14664062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of online resources to support patient decision-making for full-thickness rectal prolapse surgery.
    Fowler GE; Baker DM; Lee MJ; Brown SR
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Nov; 21(11):853-862. PubMed ID: 29101494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality and readability of online health information on menopausal hormone therapy in Canada: what are our patients reading?
    Murtaza F; Shirreff L; Huang LN; Jacobson M; Jarcevic R; Christakis MK
    Menopause; 2021 Dec; 29(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34905747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing internet-based information used to aid patient decision-making about surgery for perianal Crohn's fistula.
    Marshall JH; Baker DM; Lee MJ; Jones GL; Lobo AJ; Brown SR
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Jun; 21(6):461-469. PubMed ID: 28643034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.