138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35438796)
1. Informative presence bias in analyses of electronic health records-derived data: a cautionary note.
Harton J; Mitra N; Hubbard RA
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Jun; 29(7):1191-1199. PubMed ID: 35438796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How and when informative visit processes can bias inference when using electronic health records data for clinical research.
Goldstein BA; Phelan M; Pagidipati NJ; Peskoe SB
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 31553474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Quantitative Bias Analysis Approach to Informative Presence Bias in Electronic Health Records.
Zhang H; Clark AS; Hubbard RA
Epidemiology; 2024 May; 35(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 38630509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the Nature of Informative Presence Bias in Analyses of Electronic Health Records.
McGee G; Haneuse S; Coull BA; Weisskopf MG; Rotem RS
Epidemiology; 2022 Jan; 33(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 34711733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can the Use of Bayesian Analysis Methods Correct for Incompleteness in Electronic Health Records Diagnosis Data? Development of a Novel Method Using Simulated and Real-Life Clinical Data.
Ford E; Rooney P; Hurley P; Oliver S; Bremner S; Cassell J
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():54. PubMed ID: 32211363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does pattern mixture modelling reduce bias due to informative attrition compared to fitting a mixed effects model to the available cases or data imputed using multiple imputation?: a simulation study.
Welch CA; Sabia S; Brunner E; Kivimäki M; Shipley MJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):89. PubMed ID: 30157752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inflation of type I error rates due to differential misclassification in EHR-derived outcomes: Empirical illustration using breast cancer recurrence.
Chen Y; Wang J; Chubak J; Hubbard RA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30375122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing Bias Due to Outcome Misclassification for Epidemiologic Studies Using EHR-derived Probabilistic Phenotypes.
Hubbard RA; Tong J; Duan R; Chen Y
Epidemiology; 2020 Jul; 31(4):542-550. PubMed ID: 32282406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adult patient access to electronic health records.
Ammenwerth E; Neyer S; Hörbst A; Mueller G; Siebert U; Schnell-Inderst P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD012707. PubMed ID: 33634854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical inference for association studies using electronic health records: handling both selection bias and outcome misclassification.
Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):214-226. PubMed ID: 33179768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An augmented estimation procedure for EHR-based association studies accounting for differential misclassification.
Tong J; Huang J; Chubak J; Wang X; Moore JH; Hubbard RA; Chen Y
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2020 Feb; 27(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 31617899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in Sexual History Documentation in a Primary Care Electronic Health Record System.
Pickel J; Singapur A; Min J; Petsis D; Campbell K; Wood S
J Adolesc Health; 2022 Mar; 70(3):435-441. PubMed ID: 34887198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.
Zeliadt SB; Coggeshall S; Thomas E; Gelman H; Taylor SL
Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):351-359. PubMed ID: 32522024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the informational continuity of care in diabetes mellitus treatment with a nationwide Shared EHR system: Estimates from Austrian claims data.
Rinner C; Sauter SK; Endel G; Heinze G; Thurner S; Klimek P; Duftschmid G
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Aug; 92():44-53. PubMed ID: 27318070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating screening test utilization using electronic health records data.
Hubbard R; Chubak J; Rutter C
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2014 Nov; 2(1):14. PubMed ID: 25741527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Case studies in bias reduction and inference for electronic health record data with selection bias and phenotype misclassification.
Beesley LJ; Mukherjee B
Stat Med; 2022 Dec; 41(28):5501-5516. PubMed ID: 36131394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal Data Discontinuity in Electronic Health Records and Consequences for Medication Effectiveness Studies.
Joshua Lin K; Jin Y; Gagne J; Glynn RJ; Murphy SN; Tong A; Schneeweiss S
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2022 Jan; 111(1):243-251. PubMed ID: 34424534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PIE: A prior knowledge guided integrated likelihood estimation method for bias reduction in association studies using electronic health records data.
Huang J; Duan R; Hubbard RA; Wu Y; Moore JH; Xu H; Chen Y
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 29206922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlling for Informed Presence Bias Due to the Number of Health Encounters in an Electronic Health Record.
Goldstein BA; Bhavsar NA; Phelan M; Pencina MJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 184(11):847-855. PubMed ID: 27852603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
