These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3543882)
1. [Evaluation of dental and dental DX roentgen films produced by the WZF Foton]. Mlosek K; Bończyk J; Winnicka-Szmielew B Pol Przegl Radiol; 1986; 50(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 3543882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Use and evaluation of X-ray films produced by WZF Foton for occlusal radiograms]. Mlosek K; Bończyk J; Winnicka-Szmielew B; Gusiew J Czas Stomatol; 1989 Feb; 42(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 2640641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography]. Okano T; Yoda E Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations]. Barth HH; Grasser H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scanatron enhancement of radiographic contrast. Demeulemeester NS; De Smit AA J Clin Orthod; 1994 Jun; 28(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 8613513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system. McDonnell D; Price C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dental X-ray equipment and new advances in film production]. Bornvall O; Eckerdal O; Tammisalo EH Tandlakartidningen; 1982 Nov; 74(21):1193-5, 1197, 1199. PubMed ID: 6963017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. Benz C; Mouyen F Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A film and cassette holder for simultaneous xeroradiography and conventional radiography in longitudinal studies. Griffiths GS; Coulthurst SK; Gillett IR; Johnson NW Br Dent J; 1988 Jun; 164(11):365-7. PubMed ID: 3165014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films. Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of E-speed film with added filtration. Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of D- and E-speed intraoral film. Kaugars GE; Harmon FJ; Kaugars CC Gen Dent; 1984; 32(4):316-7. PubMed ID: 6590413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a narrow tubular collimator produce better dental radiographs? Hedin M; Halse A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1981; 10(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6949844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dental radiographic diagnostic resolution with minimal exposure. Klein AI; Campbell E; Yim P; Synenberg W Pediatr Dent; 1985 Mar; 7(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3857560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views. Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoral digital radiography. Alder ME Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films]. Hofmann T Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]