147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35439372)
1. Implant-Supported Extra-Orally Cemented Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study up to 18 Months in Function.
Cakan U; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 Nov; 30(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 35439372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study.
Cheng CW; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29086467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Novel Full-Digital Protocol (SCAN-PLAN-MAKE-DONE
Mangano F; Margiani B; Admakin O
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30678357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.
Cantner F; Cacaci C; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 30887188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns.
Kraus RD; Espuelas C; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Sailer I; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):537-547. PubMed ID: 35224774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.
Cacaci C; Cantner F; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):1953-1959. PubMed ID: 27796574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial.
Zumstein K; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Benic G; Mühlemann S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 37668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical, Technical, and Radiologic Outcomes of 182 Implant-Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Using Titanium-Base Abutments: A Retrospective Study.
Guncu MB; Aktas G; Guncu GN; Anıl D; Turkyilmaz I; Antonoff LR
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(4):553–559. PubMed ID: 35323829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results.
Cooper LF; Stanford C; Feine J; McGuire M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26831919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screw-retained monolithic zirconia vs. cemented porcelain-fused-to-metal implant crowns: a prospective randomized clinical trial in split-mouth design.
Weigl P; Saarepera K; Hinrikus K; Wu Y; Trimpou G; Lorenz J
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 29946832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.
Ekfeldt A; Fürst B; Carlsson GE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 21382085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cemented versus screw-retained posterior implant-supported single crowns: A 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial.
Wolfart S; Rittich A; Groß K; Hartkamp O; von der Stück A; Raith S; Reich S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 34547824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Full-zirconia single-tooth molar implant-supported restorations with angulated screw channel abutments: evaluation of short-term outcomes].
Lin HX; Huang J; Sun YX; Xia JX
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Aug; 30(4):384-388. PubMed ID: 34693431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zirconia crowns cemented on titanium bars using CAD/CAM: a five-year follow-up prospective clinical study of 9 patients.
Scarano A; Stoppaccioli M; Casolino T
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 31856799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.
Kim W; Li XC; Bidra AS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 35929416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
