These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35439483)

  • 1. An integrated decision making approach for selecting a sustainable waste water treatment technology.
    Narayanamoorthy S; Brainy JV; Sulaiman R; Ferrara M; Ahmadian A; Kang D
    Chemosphere; 2022 Aug; 301():134568. PubMed ID: 35439483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
    Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entropy for q-rung linear diophantine fuzzy hypersoft set with its application in MADM.
    Surya AN; Vimala J; Kausar N; Stević Ž; Shah MA
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5770. PubMed ID: 38459101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of plastic solid waste treatment technology based on cumulative prospect theory and fuzzy DEMATEL.
    Mao Q; Chen J; Lv J; Guo M; Xie P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41505-41536. PubMed ID: 36633741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
    Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach to
    Almagrabi AO; Abdullah S; Shams M; Al-Otaibi YD; Ashraf S
    J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput; 2022; 13(4):1687-1713. PubMed ID: 33841585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Various distance between generalized Diophantine fuzzy sets using multiple criteria decision making and their real life applications.
    Palanikumar M; Kausar N; Pamucar D; Simic V; Tolasa FT
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):20073. PubMed ID: 39209940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On m-polar Diophantine Fuzzy N-soft Set with Applications.
    Liu JB; Ali S; Mahmood MK; Mateen MH
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2022; 25(3):536-546. PubMed ID: 33380296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.
    Celik E; Yucesan M; Gul M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64793-64817. PubMed ID: 34313933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder multi-criteria methodology for water allocation and reuse in metropolitan areas.
    Pourmand E; Mahjouri N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jun; 190(7):444. PubMed ID: 29961116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of food waste treatment techniques using the complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy generalized TODIM method with weighted power geometric operator.
    Cao Y; Han X; Wu X; Deveci M; Kadry S; Delen D
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 353():120105. PubMed ID: 38325282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Entropy and discrimination measures based q-rung orthopair fuzzy MULTIMOORA framework for selecting solid waste disposal method.
    Mishra AR; Rani P; Pamucar D; Hezam IM; Saha A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(5):12988-13011. PubMed ID: 36121629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A group decision-making tool for the application of membrane technologies in different water reuse scenarios.
    Sadr SM; Saroj DP; Kouchaki S; Ilemobade AA; Ouki SK
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 156():97-108. PubMed ID: 25839744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multi-criteria group decision-making framework for investment assessment of offshore floating wind-solar-aquaculture project under probabilistic linguistic environment.
    Mao Q; Guo M; Lv J; Chen J; Tian M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40752-40782. PubMed ID: 36622615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA - Fuzzy MABAC model.
    Nedeljković M; Puška A; Doljanica S; Virijević Jovanović S; Brzaković P; Stević Ž; Marinkovic D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246857. PubMed ID: 33630837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty.
    Wibowo S; Deng H
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():127-35. PubMed ID: 25804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation.
    Tayebikhorami S; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):468. PubMed ID: 31243555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Circular economy of medical waste: novel intelligent medical waste management framework based on extension linear Diophantine fuzzy FDOSM and neural network approach.
    Chew X; Khaw KW; Alnoor A; Ferasso M; Al Halbusi H; Muhsen YR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(21):60473-60499. PubMed ID: 37036648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Waste-to-energy incineration site selection framework based on heterogeneous fuzzy regret-PROMETHEE model considering life-cycle carbon emissions.
    Guo F; Men H; Chen W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(3):3722-3744. PubMed ID: 38091218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sustainable supply chain partner selection and order allocation: A hybrid fuzzy PL-TODIM based MCGDM approach.
    Zhong S; Zhang J; He X; Liu S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0271194. PubMed ID: 36137146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.