These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35439661)
1. The use of coercive measures in a high security setting in Belgium: Prevalence and risk factors. van Heesch B; Boucké J; De Somer J; Dekkers I; Jacob E; Jeandarme I Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 82():101792. PubMed ID: 35439661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients. Hotzy F; Moetteli S; Theodoridou A; Schneeberger AR; Seifritz E; Hoff P; Jäger M Swiss Med Wkly; 2018; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of coercive measures on mental health status in adult psychiatric populations: a nationwide trial emulation. Baggio S; Kaiser S; Huber CG; Wullschleger A Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2024 Sep; 33():e35. PubMed ID: 39262155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends in the use of coercive measures in Finnish psychiatric hospitals: a register analysis of the past two decades. Välimäki M; Yang M; Vahlberg T; Lantta T; Pekurinen V; Anttila M; Normand SL BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Jul; 19(1):230. PubMed ID: 31349787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlates of seclusion and restraint of patients admitted to psychiatric inpatient treatment via a German emergency room. Cole C; Vandamme A; Bermpohl F; Czernin K; Wullschleger A; Mahler L J Psychiatr Res; 2020 Nov; 130():201-206. PubMed ID: 32829167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Structural Features and Use of Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry Throughout Germany]. Reinwald JR; Horten B; Dreßing H; Salize HJ Psychiatr Prax; 2022 Jan; 49(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 33773502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry. Steinert T; Hirsch S; Goebel R; Snellgrove B; Flammer E Eur Psychiatry; 2020 Nov; 63(1):e102. PubMed ID: 33213539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017]. Steinert T; Hirsch S; Flammer E Nervenarzt; 2022 Jul; 93(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 35303128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics. Mann K; Gröschel S; Singer S; Breitmaier J; Claus S; Fani M; Rambach S; Salize HJ; Lieb K BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Aug; 21(1):419. PubMed ID: 34419009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective. Noorthoorn E; Lepping P; Janssen W; Hoogendoorn A; Nijman H; Widdershoven G; Steinert T Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):1857-69. PubMed ID: 26188503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seclusion as a coercive measure in suicidality - daily routine or exception? Gavrilovic Haustein N; Freudiger M; Hunziker A; Hepp U; Jellestad L; von Känel R; Stulz N BMC Psychiatry; 2022 Jun; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 35752775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of coercive measures in adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment: a nation-wide register study. Ulla S; Maritta V; Riittakerttu KH Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 47(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 22113718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions. Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Cross sectional questionnaire survey. Jalil R; Huber JW; Sixsmith J; Dickens GL Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Oct; 75():130-138. PubMed ID: 28797822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seclusion versus mechanical restraint in psychiatry - a systematic review. Gleerup CS; Østergaard SD; Hjuler RS Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2019 Oct; 31(5):237-245. PubMed ID: 31190673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry. Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion. Tingleff EB; Bradley SK; Gildberg FA; Munksgaard G; Hounsgaard L J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 Nov; 24(9-10):681-698. PubMed ID: 28665512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units. Chieze M; Kaiser S; Courvoisier D; Hurst S; Sentissi O; Fredouille J; Wullschleger A BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 21(1):82. PubMed ID: 33557780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Humane treatment versus means of control: coercive measures in Norwegian high-security psychiatry, 1895-1978. Rabben MB; Thomassen Ø Hist Psychiatry; 2019 Dec; 30(4):424-442. PubMed ID: 31390904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]