221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35439753)
1. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
Klingel M; Laback B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-Term Improvement in Localization for Cochlear Implant Users with Single-Sided Deafness.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Buss E; Rooth MA; Richter ME; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Laryngoscope; 2022 Dec; 132(12):2453-2458. PubMed ID: 35174886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extent of lateralization at large interaural time differences in simulated electric hearing and bilateral cochlear implant users.
Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2338. PubMed ID: 28464641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.
Vollmer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(31):6949-6966. PubMed ID: 29959238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaural level difference cues determine sound source localization by single-sided deaf patients fit with a cochlear implant.
Dorman MF; Zeitler D; Cook SJ; Loiselle L; Yost WA; Wanna GB; Gifford RH
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 25896774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb C; Kan A; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2272-87. PubMed ID: 23556595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sound Localization in Real-Time Vocoded Cochlear-Implant Simulations With Normal-Hearing Listeners.
Ausili SA; Backus B; Agterberg MJH; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519847332. PubMed ID: 31088265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Unilateral Hearing Loss: Initial Localization Abilities.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Anderson ML; King ER; Deres EJ; Buchman CA; Brown KD; Pillsbury HC
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):611-619. PubMed ID: 28375876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.
Dirks C; Nelson PB; Sladen DP; Oxenham AJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1293-1306. PubMed ID: 30870240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
