126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35440476)
41. Prognostic role of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma.
Albano D; Bertoli M; Battistotti M; Rodella C; Statuto M; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Oct; 32(8):532-541. PubMed ID: 29982990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Is True Whole-Body
Cerci JJ; Etchebehere EC; Nadel H; Brink A; Bal CS; Rangarajan V; Pfluger T; Kagna O; Alonso O; Begum FK; Mir KB; Magboo VP; Menezes LJ; Paez D; Pascual TN
J Nucl Med; 2019 Aug; 60(8):1087-1093. PubMed ID: 30683766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Osteosarcoma Using Convolutional Neural Network of Tumor Center
Kim J; Jeong SY; Kim BC; Byun BH; Lim I; Kong CB; Song WS; Lim SM; Woo SK
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 34829324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Correlation between
Zhao J; Wang H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Apr; 65(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 33538120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Value of baseline and end of chemotherapy
Xiao Z; Mo Y; Long W; Li R; Li X; Wei Y; Fan W; Zhang X
Leuk Lymphoma; 2021 Dec; 62(12):2873-2881. PubMed ID: 34165390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quantitative Radiomics Features in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Does Segmentation Method Matter?
Eertink JJ; Pfaehler EAG; Wiegers SE; van T; Brug D; Lugtenburg PJ; Hoekstra OS; Zijlstra JM; de Vet HCW; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2022 Mar; 63(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 34272315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Metabolic tumor burden on baseline
Chen S; He K; Feng F; Wang S; Yin Y; Fu H; Wang H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Aug; 46(9):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 31187163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Automatic detection and classification of regions of FDG uptake in whole-body PET-CT lymphoma studies.
Bi L; Kim J; Kumar A; Wen L; Feng D; Fulham M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2017 Sep; 60():3-10. PubMed ID: 27955798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer before primary treatment: correlation between tumour burden assessed by [
Glickman A; Paredes P; Carreras-Diéguez N; Niñerola-Baizán A; Gaba L; Pahisa J; Fusté P; Del Pino M; Díaz-Feijóo B; González-Bosquet E; Agustí N; Sánchez-Izquierdo N; Fuster D; Perissinotti A; Romero I; Fernández-Galán E; Carrasco JL; Gil-Ibáñez B; Torné A
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2200-2208. PubMed ID: 34586465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Repeatability of Quantitative Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Measures as Function of Uptake Interval and Lesion Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.
Kramer GM; Frings V; Hoetjes N; Hoekstra OS; Smit EF; de Langen AJ; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1343-9. PubMed ID: 27103020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Convolutional Neural Networks in Predicting Nodal and Distant Metastatic Potential of Newly Diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on FDG PET Images.
Tau N; Stundzia A; Yasufuku K; Hussey D; Metser U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):192-197. PubMed ID: 32348182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Quantification of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Whole-Body Tumor Burden with
Wibmer AG; Morris MJ; Gonen M; Zheng J; Hricak H; Larson S; Scher HI; Vargas HA
J Nucl Med; 2021 Aug; 62(8):1050-1056. PubMed ID: 33419944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Baseline [
Yang Q; Luo Y; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Zhou D; Li F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5568-5576. PubMed ID: 35316362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of
Kaste SC; Snyder SE; Metzger ML; Sandlund JT; Howard SC; Krasin M; Shulkin BL
J Nucl Med; 2017 Mar; 58(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 27609791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic Yield of Body CT and Whole-Body FDG PET/CT for Initial Systemic Staging in Patients With Suspected Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park HY; Suh CH; Huang RY; Guenette JP; Kim HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1172-1182. PubMed ID: 32812800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. The impact of
Elmanzalawy A; Vali R; Chavhan GB; Gupta AA; Omarkhail Y; Amirabadi A; Shammas A
Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Feb; 50(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 31628508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Bone Marrow Involvement in Childhood Cancers.
Yağci-Küpeli B; Koçyiğit-Deveci E; Adamhasan F; Küpeli S
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 41(6):438-441. PubMed ID: 31033787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
