353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35441414)
1. Efficacy and safety of high-power short duration atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Lüsebrink U; Behnes M; Akin I; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 35441414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute oesophageal safety and long-term follow-up of AI-guided high-power short-duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.
Müller J; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Ene E; Sonne K; Zhuravlev V; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Halbfass P; Deneke T
Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1379-1391. PubMed ID: 36881791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation-50 W or 90 W?
Mueller J; Nentwich K; Ene E; Berkovitz A; Sonne K; Chakarov I; Barth S; Waechter C; Behnes M; Akin I; Halbfass P; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2504-2513. PubMed ID: 36124396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablation compared with a conventional approach: Outcomes and reconnection patterns.
Hansom SP; Alqarawi W; Birnie DH; Golian M; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Klein A; Green MS; Davis DR; Sheppard-Perkins E; Ramirez FD; Nair GM; Sadek MM
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 32(5):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 33751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Randomized Trial of High vs Standard Power Radiofrequency Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: SHORT-AF.
Lee AC; Voskoboinik A; Cheung CC; Yogi S; Tseng ZH; Moss JD; Dewland TA; Lee BK; Lee RJ; Hsia HH; Marcus GM; Vedantham V; Chieng D; Kistler PM; Dillon W; Vittinghoff E; Gerstenfeld EP
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Jul; 9(7 Pt 2):1038-1047. PubMed ID: 37495318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety aspects of very high power very short duration atrial fibrillation ablation using a modified radiofrequency RF-generator: Single-center experience.
Mueller J; Halbfass P; Sonne K; Nentwich K; Ene E; Berkovitz A; Lehmkuhl L; Barth S; Simu GR; Waechter C; Behnes M; Deneke T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 May; 33(5):920-927. PubMed ID: 35233883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation procedure after recurrence of atrial fibrillation.
Simu G; Deneke T; Ene E; Nentwich K; Berkovitz A; Sonne K; Halbfass P; Arvaniti E; Waechter C; Müller J
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 65(2):551-558. PubMed ID: 35857220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of two 50 W high power short duration approaches-Temperature- versus ablation index-guided radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Guckel D; Bergau L; Braun M; El Hamriti M; Mörsdorf M; Fink T; Sciacca V; Khalaph M; Imnadze G; Sommer P; Sohns C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Dec; 33(12):2517-2527. PubMed ID: 36104929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Kottmaier M; Popa M; Bourier F; Reents T; Cifuentes J; Semmler V; Telishevska M; Otgonbayar U; Koch-Büttner K; Lennerz C; Bartkowiak M; Kornmayer M; Rousseva E; Brkic A; Grebmer C; Kolb C; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I
Europace; 2020 Mar; 22(3):388-393. PubMed ID: 31872249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-power, short-duration atrial fibrillation ablations using contact force sensing catheters: Outcomes and predictors of success including posterior wall isolation.
Winkle RA; Mead RH; Engel G; Kong MH; Salcedo J; Brodt CR; Patrawala RA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Aug; 17(8):1223-1231. PubMed ID: 32272229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between High-Power Short-Duration and Conventional Ablation Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Li M; Ma Y; Lin Q; Huang Y; Liu Y; Tu T; Liu Q
Cardiovasc Ther; 2022; 2022():1065077. PubMed ID: 35975140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Higher power short duration vs. lower power longer duration posterior wall ablation for atrial fibrillation and oesophageal injury outcomes: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled study (Hi-Lo HEAT trial).
Chieng D; Segan L; Sugumar H; Al-Kaisey A; Hawson J; Moore BM; Nam MCY; Voskoboinik A; Prabhu S; Ling LH; Ng JF; Brown G; Lee G; Morton J; Debinski H; Kalman JM; Kistler PM
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):417-424. PubMed ID: 36305561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconnection patterns after CLOSE-guided 50 W high-power-short-duration circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification-PV reconnection might no longer be an issue.
Francke A; Scharfe F; Schoen S; Wunderlich C; Christoph M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Jun; 33(6):1136-1145. PubMed ID: 35118734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 50-W vs 40-W During High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Costea A; Diaz JC; Osorio J; Matos CD; Hoyos C; Goyal S; Te C; D'Souza B; Rastogi M; Lopez-Cabanillas N; Ibanez LC; Thorne C; Varley AL; Zei PC; Sauer WH; Romero JE
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 9(12):2573-2583. PubMed ID: 37804258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-power short-duration versus standard-power standard-duration settings for repeat atrial fibrillation ablation.
Junarta J; Dikdan SJ; Upadhyay N; Bodempudi S; Shvili MY; Frisch DR
Heart Vessels; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 34846561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical and procedural outcomes between high-power short-duration, standard-power standard-duration, and temperature-controlled noncontact force guided ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Dikdan SJ; Junarta J; Bodempudi S; Upadhyay N; Pang Z; Frisch DR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 33415782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation guided by the ablation index.
Sousa PA; Puga L; Barra S; Adão L; Primo J; Khoueiry Z; Lebreiro A; Fonseca P; Pereira M; Lagrange P; d'Avila A; Oliveiros B; Elvas L; Gonçalves L
Int J Cardiol; 2023 Jan; 370():209-214. PubMed ID: 36228764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial.
Joza J; Nair GM; Birnie DH; Nery PB; Redpath CJ; Sarrazin JF; Champagne J; Bernick J; Wells GA; Essebag V;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 35(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 37990448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety profile and long-term efficacy of very high-power short-duration (60-70 W) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results of a large comparative analysis.
Popa MA; Bourier F; Lengauer S; Krafft H; Bahlke F; Förschner LV; Dorfmeister S; Kathan S; Telishevska M; Englert F; Lennerz C; Reents T; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I; Kottmaier M
Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 36504120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat catheter ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation: Electrophysiologic findings and clinical outcomes.
Daimee UA; Akhtar T; Boyle TA; Jager L; Arbab-Zadeh A; Marine JE; Berger RD; Calkins H; Spragg DD
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):628-638. PubMed ID: 33410561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
