378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35441529)
1. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnostic accuracy of
Daniels H; Gilbert R; Bonin L
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Sep; 54(3):545-555. PubMed ID: 37211439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone scintigraphy as a gatekeeper for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Caglar M; Tuncel M; Yildiz E; Karabulut E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):932-941. PubMed ID: 32975741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-head comparison of
Zhang Y; Lin Z; Li T; Wei Y; Yu M; Ye L; Cai Y; Yang S; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Chen W
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15993. PubMed ID: 36163353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
Simsek DH; Sanli Y; Civan C; Engin MN; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Kuyumcu S
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 34(7):476-485. PubMed ID: 32394269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bone Uptake in Bone Scan and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Acar E; Bekiş R; Polack B
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(6):589-594. PubMed ID: 32008568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hybrid
Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and
Pyka T; Okamoto S; Dahlbender M; Tauber R; Retz M; Heck M; Tamaki N; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Nov; 43(12):2114-2121. PubMed ID: 27290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, multicenter head-to-head comparative study in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer investigating the bone lesion detection of conventional imaging and
Bodar YJL; Luining WI; Keizer B; Meijer D; Vellekoop A; Schaaf M; Hendrikse NH; Van Moorselaar RJA; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):205.e17-205.e24. PubMed ID: 36588019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-individual comparison of
Bénard F; Harsini S; Wilson D; Zukotynski K; Abikhzer G; Turcotte E; Cossette M; Metser U; Romsa J; Martin M; Mar C; Saad F; Soucy JP; Eigl BJ; Black P; Krauze A; Burrell S; Nichol A; Tardif JC
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1499-1507. PubMed ID: 36343655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraindividual Comparison of
Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
