These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35441530)

  • 1. Coronary CTA With AI-QCT Interpretation: Comparison With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Obstructive Stenosis Using Invasive Angiography as Reference Standard.
    Lipkin I; Telluri A; Kim Y; Sidahmed A; Krepp JM; Choi BG; Jonas R; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Crabtree TR; Earls JP; Choi AD; Min JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):407-419. PubMed ID: 35441530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AI Evaluation of Stenosis on Coronary CTA, Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve: A CREDENCE Trial Substudy.
    Griffin WF; Choi AD; Riess JS; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Earls JP
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Feb; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 35183478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Validation of a Quantitative Coronary CT Angiography Model for Diagnosis of Vessel-Specific Coronary Ischemia.
    Nurmohamed NS; Danad I; Jukema RA; de Winter RW; de Groot RJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; van Diemen P; Pontone G; Andreini D; Chang HJ; Katz RJ; Stroes ESG; Wang H; Chan C; Crabtree T; Aquino M; Min JK; Earls JP; Bax JJ; Choi AD; Knaapen P; van Rosendael AR;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Aug; 17(8):894-906. PubMed ID: 38483420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atherosclerosis Imaging Quantitative Computed Tomography (AI-QCT) to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography in the randomized controlled CONSERVE trial.
    Kim Y; Choi AD; Telluri A; Lipkin I; Bradley AJ; Sidahmed A; Jonas R; Andreini D; Bathina R; Baggiano A; Cerci R; Choi EY; Choi JH; Choi SY; Chung N; Cole J; Doh JH; Ha SJ; Her AY; Kepka C; Kim JY; Kim JW; Kim SW; Kim W; Pontone G; Villines TC; Cho I; Danad I; Heo R; Lee SE; Lee JH; Park HB; Sung JM; Crabtree T; Earls JP; Min JK; Chang HJ
    Clin Cardiol; 2023 May; 46(5):477-483. PubMed ID: 36847047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial.
    Stuijfzand WJ; van Rosendael AR; Lin FY; Chang HJ; van den Hoogen IJ; Gianni U; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Lu Y; Berman DS; Narula J; Min JK; Bax JJ; Shaw LJ;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 32822476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
    Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-site assessment of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Miyajima K; Motoyama S; Sarai M; Kawai H; Nagahara Y; Matsumoto R; Fujiwara W; Muramatsu T; Takahashi H; Naruse H; Ishii J; Kondo T; Narula J; Izawa H; Ozaki Y
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1331-1340. PubMed ID: 32350637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nous FMA; Geisler T; Kruk MBP; Alkadhi H; Kitagawa K; Vliegenthart R; Hell MM; Hausleiter J; Nguyen PK; Budde RPJ; Nikolaou K; Kepka C; Manka R; Sakuma H; Malik SB; Coenen A; Zijlstra F; Klotz E; van der Harst P; Artzner C; Dedic A; Pugliese F; Bamberg F; Nieman K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jan; 15(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 34538630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography.
    Jonas RA; Barkovich E; Choi AD; Griffin WF; Riess J; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson RC; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Guglielmo M; Al-Mallah MH; Jennings RS; Crabtree TR; Earls JP
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Apr; 84():149-158. PubMed ID: 35217284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
    Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.
    Ponte M; Bettencourt N; Pereira E; Ferreira ND; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Albuquerque A; Gama V; Nagel E
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Dec; 30(8):1589-97. PubMed ID: 25082645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary CTA plaque volume severity stages according to invasive coronary angiography and FFR.
    Min JK; Chang HJ; Andreini D; Pontone G; Guglielmo M; Bax JJ; Knaapen P; Raman SV; Chazal RA; Freeman AM; Crabtree T; Earls JP
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 35379596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-Speed On-Site Deep Learning-Based FFR-CT Algorithm: Evaluation Using Invasive Angiography as the Reference Standard.
    Giannopoulos AA; Keller L; Sepulcri D; Boehm R; Garefa C; Venugopal P; Mitra J; Ghose S; Deak P; Pack JD; Davis CL; Stähli BE; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Kaufmann PA; Buechel RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Oct; 221(4):460-470. PubMed ID: 37132550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rationale and Design of the CREDENCE Trial: computed TomogRaphic evaluation of atherosclerotic DEtermiNants of myocardial IsChEmia.
    Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Knaapen P; Leipsic J; Shaw LJ; Andreini D; Pontone G; Raman S; Khan MA; Ridner M; Nabi F; Gimelli A; Jang J; Cole J; Nakazato R; Zarins C; Han D; Lee JH; Szymonifika J; Gomez MJ; Truong QA; Chang HJ; Lin FY; Min JK
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Oct; 16(1):190. PubMed ID: 27716131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic value of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary CTA-derived ischemia algorithm among patients with normal or abnormal myocardial perfusion.
    Bär S; Maaniitty T; Nabeta T; Bax JJ; Earls JP; Min JK; Saraste A; Knuuti J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2024; 18(4):366-374. PubMed ID: 38664074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stepwise strategy integrating dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion and deep learning-based FFR
    Lyu L; Pan J; Li D; Yu D; Li X; Yang W; Dong M; Han Y; Liang Y; Zhang P; Zhang M
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; 34(8):4939-4949. PubMed ID: 38214735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.